My point is extremely coherent. If you want to dismiss any close victories, some of those you listed do not count. If you only want to include dominant victories, very few are significantly better than Lemieux, Murray and Brook.
If you can't be specific, I'm done here. No fights I've listed were debatable except for ones involving GGG. I think you're drunk right now.
I don't need to be specific, you listed the fights and the criteria, not me. You are the one whose made the argument, not me. Golovkin has beaten top opposition in close fights, he's beaten top opposition in clear fights. There might well be some in the top ten pfp who have a clearer victory over better opposition than Golovkin has, but there aren't many in the world who can make that claim. Even if they could, it would matter not. The thread is about Golovkin vs Charlo. I think Golovkin is a favourite, but it's a very risky fight.
Pretty much my opinion as well these days. I’ll add this, if GGG’s jab doesn’t control the action, Charlo likely wins a decision with fast, accurate combinations.
Korobov schooled Jermall till he ran out of gas. after all that was expected, he took a 12 round fight on a weeks notice, but had only trained for an 8 round under card fight. Korobov still did enough to win the fight but Charlo got a dec he didnt deserve. Par for the course in boxing Sadly
GGG don't even think he can beat Charlo right now. It's a reason he's avoiding Charlo. Charlo beats GGG!
Korobov was tapping Charlos face all night. The only good thing Charlo showed in that fight was the chin as he blocked most of the punches with his face. Russian getting robbed in US? What a surprise..