Jack Johnson's Power ???

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jun 24, 2011.


  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    24,962
    8,667
    Jul 15, 2008
    Pretty good analogy ... however he did tee off on Willard time and again and could not budge him ... comparing that to Dempsey you see a huge jump in power to the Mauler ..
     
  2. Armstrong!

    Armstrong! Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    3
    Jun 10, 2011
    Dempsey's one of the hardest punchers of all time, though.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,890
    Jun 2, 2006
    Different Willard's though one was a trained to the minute challenger facing a fat 37 year old Champ,the other scenario was the reverse.
     
  4. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008

    In 1915, Jess Willard was still under age 35 and a lean 230 pounds in Cuba..... Meanwhile, Jack Johnson was 37 and reported to be a soft 227 pounds in Cuba.... Two fighters in two different directions.....

    Come 1919 in Ohio, Jess Willard was a soft 245 and over age 35 and had been horribly inactive as champion.... Jess showed up with a guaranteed huge check for 1919 and basically was willing to lose to Jack Dempsey so he could go farm some land and break horses in Kansas.....

    MR.BILL:deal:bbb:admin
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    24,962
    8,667
    Jul 15, 2008
    True a different Willard but Dempsey got him 30 seconds in when he was quite fresh ( although maybe not properly warmed up ) ...
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    Johnson's weight is debatable. What many forget to mention is that Willard himself was 34 years old, with only 24 fights, and had only gone past 12 rounds once in his career to date.

    This content is protected
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,890
    Jun 2, 2006
    Willard had 29 fights and was 33 years old.
    So that's two figures you gave, both wrong.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,890
    Jun 2, 2006
    What's debatable about his weight? He scaled 225lbs,the heaviest he had weighed up to that point,4 lbs more than he did for Moran when he was as fat as pig,the figure is correct ,unlike your two figures for Willard who was 33 ,and had 29 fights up to that time.Not 34years old ,and 24 ,fights. Willard had gone 20 rds with Gunboat Smith so he had no worries about stamina.

    Willard trained like a dog for the fight, banging his sparring partners around,whereas Johnson clowned with his [Armstrong,and McVey].
    The New York Herald said," Johnson is fat to the point of paunch".

    Keep your agenda coming ,and I'll keep blowing it out of the water.

    You might notice I didn't give Johnson credit for being a big puncher.

    It's called being objective.something you couldn't even spell ,let alone comprehend.
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    Box rec says Willard was 20-3-1 on Johnson's page. That is 24 fights. Perhaps they are not counting the news paper decisions.

    [url]1915-04-05[/url]225[url]Jess Willard[/url]238½
    This content is protected
    -
    This content is protected
    -
    This content is protected


    It is interesting to note that Willard had little boxing experience. If he had any amateur experience, that's news to me. He was only a pro since 1911, knocking Johnson out in 1915. As I mentioned before, Willard had only gone past 12 rounds once prior to meeting Johnson, and that was in a losing effort.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,890
    Jun 2, 2006
    Having been challenged on Willard's number of fights anyone who had any kind of sense would have immediately looked on his box rec page would they not?
    Can't you find it in yourself to just say ,ok I was WRONG? About his number of fights ,and also his age?
    **** me, I am pissed,just got in from a very good jazz session, but you are something else in ,I dont know how many posts you have made , but you have never conceded you were WRONG.

    You do my job for me.:patsch
    Do you think you are fooling anyone except yourself?
    You sad clown.:-(
     
  11. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    3,763
    13
    Feb 16, 2008
    I'd say his power was like Larry Holmes - not one punch, but more than enough to keep an opponent from wanting to trade with him.
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    I was quoting something from Box rec on his total number of fights leading up to the Johnson match that was wrong. So what.

    However, like I said it is interesting to note that Willard had little boxing experience. If he had any amateur experience, that's news to me. He was only a pro since 1911, knocking Johnson out in 1915. As I mentioned before, Willard had only gone past 12 rounds once prior to meeting Johnson, and that was in a losing effort.

    As for perpetuating lies, why don't you show me a weather report which said it was over 100 degrees in April. :lol:
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,890
    Jun 2, 2006
    So what? You were wrong, about his fights and also his age ,can't you just admit it?
    People might begin to have a modicum of respect for you, if you could bring your self to say those three words."I was wrong".


    How the hell would I find a weather report that is nearly a hundred years old?
    I'll go with the testimony of writers ,Willard ,and promoter Barney Curley ,who were actually there.