Who is the better Klitschko ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Jun 30, 2011.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,474
    9,364
    Jul 17, 2009
    Vitali or Wladimir ? Can't make up my mind.
     
  2. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    58
    Dec 26, 2009
    Greatness: Wlad

    "Fighting" ability: Vitali

    "Boxing" ability: Wlad
     
  3. Goodhill

    Goodhill Iron Horse - born to lose Full Member

    3,077
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    Vitali - no doubt. His only true loss (forget about that arm injury and no más -****) was against Lennox and it was the cut that ended the fight, in which Vitali was clearly ahead on points. OK - Lennox was not in his prime anymore and it was a TKO win for him, but still it´s not a bad loss (shame there was no rubber match).

    Vitali hasn´t been KD´d and he has avenged his little brothers losses.

    Vitali is the man in that family.
     
  4. davbeatle

    davbeatle New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Jul 5, 2009
    Vitali is the by far the better of the two he destroys the fighters Vladimir loses too and I pick him to do the same with David Haye
     
  5. maciekao

    maciekao New Member Full Member

    86
    0
    Feb 5, 2011
  6. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,896
    2,232
    Jul 19, 2004
    Vitali is better.
    Despite looking unorthodox, Vitali is the better boxer:
    Vitali can make adjustments.
    Vitali throws a wider variety of puches, form different angles.
    Vitali can punch and move.
    Vitali has the solid chin.
    Vitali has better stamina and a higher workrate.

    Wlad hits harder and his hands are quicker. Everything else is all Vitali.
     
  7. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Wlad. Better skill, better power, faster, and has better competition. Vitali is a 'warrior' or whatever, but i'll take Wlad.
     
  8. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    there both shite.and haye will show how embaressingly bad they actually are.i feel bad for them there in over there heads and they dont know it
     
  9. joeboxer

    joeboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,079
    0
    Oct 30, 2005
    I agree. Also Wlad sticks to his game plan incredibly well. However, Vitali adjusts. In the Sanders fights Wlad stepped right after his jab. This put in right in the path of Sanders southpaw counter. He lasted two rounds. Vitali also stepped right... was wobbled.. then adjusted. After round two Vitali never steps right.. only backwards or left.
     
  10. Vitali by far idk how some people can argue this point wlad even says it
     
  11. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010
    Well it's the common consenseus that Wlad is the technically better and Vitali is the tougher, natural fighter. Which is very true.
    Prime for prime, me personally i go with Vitali. The guy comes to fight is willing to put it on the line and while lacking his brothers technical nous, he is a very awkward and effective fighter.
    I have to say though that Wlad is a much better person outside of the ring, Vitali has no class and is a bit of a loon.
    The best description i have heard of Wlad is him being like the Wizard of OZ, percieved has this powerful scary character, and then you draw back the curtain to find this little scared man.
    I could never put Wlad above Vitali has a fighter, because everytime he has been tested, he has failed to overcome. Wheras Vitali answered questions aimed at himself.
    Wlad has the better resume and is technically excellent, but has a fighter, Vitali is the superior.
     
  12. lion

    lion Active Member Full Member

    1,489
    2
    Mar 24, 2007