Same. Even the few rounds where Haye had some success and landed the bigger shots, I still had those for Wlad for his consistent scoring with the jab and overall ring generalship. Just landing a few bombs in a round where your opponent is manipulating you around the ring with his feet and peppering you with his jab is not enough to win them in my eyes.
Yup. You could have been generous and given Haye round 3, and the round where Wlad had a point deducted. But that's it. Haye did not 'win' a single round.
the 3rd round was hayes you cant just pepper with a few little jabs and win a round with just ring generalship
there were 2 rds the 3rd and the last rd that Haye landed a clean punch so I generously gave them to him but I still think he lost the last rd and the other could have gone to Vlad but you try to be fair. I tend to favor the aggressor so a shut-out would not be unreasonable...Haye fought a survivor fight and his right toe was sore from back-peddling and side-winding...He want to land one shot and go home but ran for the most part after he found Vlad hard to hit and when he did land Vlad took it well and went right back at him.
Yeah, I had it the same. I gave Haye the 3rd and every other round to Wlad with the point deuction round being 9-9.
Of course you can. If one fighter is the aggressor, consistenly landing the jab, controlling the distance, cutting the ring down, manipulating his opponent's position with his footwork and for the most part making them miss and fall short with punches - they don't lose the round just because they're hit with 3-4 solid shots.
i was unsure of 2 rounds but a shutout wouldnt be unfair becuase wlad probably landed as many punches in haye's better rounds