Some people say it is when a guy holds all the belts (undisputed), some guys say it is when the former lineal champ is beaten. Some guys think it is when #1 beats #2 or #3. In wlads case #2 is his brother. What say you? Did wlad establish lineage last night?
No, he's not. No matter what garbage HBO tried to stuff down your throat. The only way he'll establish true lineage in the eyes of most fans is if he beats his brother.
Its bull**** he clearly is the man at heavyweight, he is already ring champion and has 3 of the 4 belts, you cant demand him to fight his brother, then number 3 haye is fine, if not wait a year till vitali retires, this is unavoidable.
I should have included a 3rd option for his win over chagaev. The thing is with the belt, but at the time chagaev was #3 as well but no belt was involved due to that whole scam.
Became the man when he beat chag. Whoever beats wlad will clearly be considered the man of the division.
I agree. Chagaev was actually the WBA champion until two weeks before their fight. When he substituted for Haye (2009), the WBA decided they wanted to keep their champion, so Valuev magically became champ, despite the fact that Chagaev had already soundly beaten him. Patterson only had to fight an old Archie Moore to become lineal champ. Burns fought a nobody to become lineal champ. Wlad has basically cleaned out the division..
No. if anyone beats wlad...VITALI IS WAITING FOR THEM LIKE THE MASTER OF MORTAL KOMBAT!!!!!! Yu hav to beat both bosses! Its a set up! Lol
I also agree that Wladimir was already lineal champion. However, I am not sure about the when aspect. I would say starting from wins over Ibragimov (Feb 2008) or Chagaev (June 2009).
He is not lineal, he has never fought let alone beat an undisputed or lineal champion. He has never won the WBC title which means he's never been undisputed. When Vitali retires and he beats whoever picks up that title then he can be regarded as Undisputed and lineal champion. Only a matter of time really there isn't anyone who is going to threaten Wlad.
Wlad was lineal champ after beating Ibragimov, given that Vitali was still retired at the time. Beating Chagaev was the final confirmation. If Haye retires now then beating Haye is probably not even a Top 5 win for Wlad in terms of legacy. But I don't think Haye will retire and there may be another Haye-Klitschko match. IMO Haye showed he has the D and chin to be competitive with Wlad and he has a chance at winning against a Klitschko if he can up his game and the Klitschkos decline.