If Haye was 6'6 and Wlad 6'3 - Wlad would have been knocked out in 2 rounds

If William Wallace would have fought, he would have shot fire from his butt, and laser from his eyes to win.

 

This content is protected

 

Dont be so stupid, that is a really stupid logic.:good

 

what the hell. this doesnt deserve its own thread and it doesnt deserve as many replies. **** off

 

i don't think so...

admit it, Wlad is better than you thought and he's better than Haye...

he always will be...

 

If I had wheels I'd be a wagon.

 

If He was 6'6 & Wlad 6'3 maybe we would have been treated to a fight. Wlad came to fight & his size had nothing to do w/it, Haye on the other hand looked pathetic. Wlad would have been a tad quicker & Haye slower & not at mobile which means he may have been Ko'd by Wlad!!

Here's a good if... If Haye walked like he talked we wouldn't have this thread & that's a fact!! :deal

Please end thread now!! :hi:

 

If I was better at boxing and Floyd Mayweather was **** I'd be better than him.

 

Haye didn't even give up that much reach and height advantage, although he was outweighed by 30 pounds. There have been plenty of shorter HW champions in the past that have beat bigger ones. It was Haye's job to find a way to deal with it, and he had a few supposed advantages as well such as: speed, mobility, and maybe better endurance due to lower weight. He couldn't find a way to deal with the challenge, get inside, or throw combinations. Wlad looked quick for such a big man, and Haye couldn't deal with the challenge. That's the bottom line, and everything else is pointless excuses.