If 2005 Morales (of Pac 1) was a jr-ww, who'd win between him and Khan (of Maidana)?

Erik Morales of the 1st Pacquiao fight

(a 130lbs fighter, but say he was 140lbs instead, say he was as comfortable at junior-welterweight for this fight as he was that night vs Pac at superfeatherweight)


vs


Amir Khan of the Maidana fight




Who wins, and how? :bbb

 

morales by stoppage, by round 9 or 10. morales' accuracy was still on point then and his power was none too shabby either. kahn wouldn't have been out cold but accumulative punishment would've bashed his face up leading to a stoppage i reckon. khan would've had moments with his 'flashy flurries' but wouldn't have had the pop in his fists to buzz the iron chinned morales. from rd 5 onwards a one sided morales fight.

 

Morales, Khan's speed is his only advantage (not counting youth and possibly stamina)

 

Morales TKO or UD. He's a far better fighter in every category, and dimension wise Khan isnt that much bigger , assuming their both in the same weight class at a comfortable weight. Khan doesn't have the experience to beat a fighter of that calibre at this stage too.

 

Morales, much easier than he beat Pacquiao. Khan does not have the experience to cope with Morales back then. And I'm sure Morales would have Khan in similar trouble to what Maidana had him in...through accumulation. Morales left to body and head would work a treat IMO.

 

are you asking p4p who would win H2H? Morales
that Morales vs That Khan = Khan UD

 

Morales by stoppage. P4p these two are on a completely different level.

 

YOU GUESSED IT!

yikes:yikes

 

morales, he's like a bhop type of fighter, he can neutralize speed and power.

 

So not only does he believe morales is better now than he was then, but he believes khan beating morales now will mean anything about khan being better p4p than morales of the pac 1 fight? The morales that beat pac, the morales that achieved something noone in this decade or the last could do?

Wow.

 

No moron. I said nothing of the sort. I said Khan would have beaten the weight drained Morales Pacquiao fought because of Khans speed and being able to fight at range.


I said Morales got schooled by Raheem because Raheem was a boxer, and I said the reason Morales looked good against Maidana and Pacquiao, because he was able to exploit their styles, in ways he couldnt aginst Khan.

Khan in my opinion would beat Morales that Pac fought for the simple fact that Morales was old and weight drained, and Khan would hold significant advantages in speed, power, reach over him, and stylistically because Morales had lost a step, was strugling to make weight that he wouldnt be able to keep up with Khan just like he couldnt keep up with C level Raheem. Khan is a far superior fighter to raheem, who lost to ****ing Rocky Juarez. :rofl


Thats the full story you little *****. :good

 

MW is a legend. The most braindead one-man comedy show in existence. :happy

 

dont worry guys i snitched to the mods, they dont like when previously banned posters come back with new usernames, he'll be gone soon!

thank me later

 

khan fights nothing like raheem you stupid child born of ****.

raheem is a ****in pot shotter while khan comes forward.

 

Khan decision