The fact that Naseem Hamed lost to Barrera means he was an overrated hype job and a fraud, I mean who loses to Barrera for gods sake. Hatton.
It's obviously Hamed. Pretty easy answer to this and I'm amazed that Hatton has so many votes to be honest. Hamed was an unbelievable talent who could have achieved so much more. He should never have left Brendan Ingle he was perfect for him.
with the amount of people who say that sorta **** seriously i can understand though nowadays its like it wasnt even a good win for barrera 'oh any top class fighter would have beat hamed' completely ignoring that barrera had to fight a quality fight to do it, mab doesnt really seem to get the credit he deserves for it imo
That's because alot of the "fans" on here are cheer leaders for fighters they like. As opposed to fans of the sport. Most also only started following boxing yesterday. They probably don't even know who MAB is.
Before you get on your high horse Scura, I'd say most peoples contributions on boxing on here are damn sight more well rounded and far reaching than yours.
How often do you post on here in a non-Hatton related thread? Bit rich criticizing others for a narrow minded approach to their forum posts IMHO....