British Forum BETTING thread

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by TFFP, Mar 1, 2009.


  1. jim holton

    jim holton Member Full Member

    258
    0
    Apr 7, 2011

    At 2/5? C'mon mate no value there. :huh

    Everything points to Green points at a decent price, but no play for me. Doubt Tarver will pull a Briggs at any point in the fight, but a 42 yr old on the slide Tarver does'nt inspire. If he's serious, he's got the savvy to take this the 12, too many buts though. No split/majority props out there, so took a flyer on a controversial draw at 33/1
     
  2. harvinmagler

    harvinmagler Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,297
    0
    Nov 26, 2009
  3. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    suprised the national press didnt pick up on it. any chance to kick boxing in the balls they take it.
     
  4. dondada

    dondada Active Member Full Member

    1,359
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    Some of them will probably rip the article off now, like they regularly do.
     
  5. sg85

    sg85 Bang on the chan Full Member

    2,045
    0
    Dec 24, 2009
    17/2 - Khan to be knocked down but still win the fight (skybet).
     
  6. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    true mate. have emailed you pal.
     
  7. Боксёр

    Боксёр Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,150
    162
    Dec 8, 2008
    Like Wade - 3.5 legs over Walsh . Wade was impressive in first round , Walsh not so much .
     
  8. Bazzel

    Bazzel Guest

    Cheers Dondada. Good link
     
  9. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    interesting all the shops were in east london
     
  10. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    1
    Apr 24, 2011
    Cook's mate's.
     
  11. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    exactly

    bet their pissed now tho:lol::lol::lol:
     
  12. TonyD407

    TonyD407 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,333
    7
    Dec 6, 2008
    the press will prob say cook took a dive in the fight cos he had a cocaine problem
    and needed the money

    they will prob say he owed hatton for a few grams
    and ricky was gonna send his mum carol round to collect the debt

    lol
     
  13. matt007

    matt007 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,777
    117
    Nov 5, 2010
    The last sentence in that article is silly indeed as real gamblers bet to win not to be patriotic. It claimed most of the bets went in for burn to win in round 3, so it proved that it wasn't fix on cook's side (unless his disc meant to go in round 3). But it didnt happen, so the bookies made a lot as it seems.
     
  14. dondada

    dondada Active Member Full Member

    1,359
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    True. Perhaps the author is trying to make a point without getting more legal correspondence?