hearns would annihalate burley h2h, as well as the top 10 guys on your list with the possible exception of SRL (who got lucky the first time).
Let's not go overboard. He would annihilate Robinson? Griffith? Walker? Napoles? I think not. In fact I'd only surely pick him to beat Napoles of that group.
OK, annihalate is too strong a term. at the worst he'd decision robinson, griffith and napoles. i've never seen walker, but he'd probably KO the old timer. i just rate hearns very highly.
Leaving Hearns out of a top ten (to say nothing of a top 20) is bad enough, but then to put Benitez ten spots higher than him is totally baffling...
Floyd & DLH shouldn't be top 20 all time welterweights take them out and add hearns and tito to the list
I'll put one out...'Head to Head' list. Ray Robinson Sugar Ray Leonard Kid Gavilan Thomas Hearns *Jose Napoles/Emile Griffith/Luis Rodriguez Charley Burley Roberto Duran Pernell Whitaker Shane Mosely Mickey Walker Felix Trinidad Henry Armstrong Carmen Basilio Billy Graham Oscar DeLahoya Joe Walcott Damn...this is hard so many variables to consider style wise....Like my log jam at 5,6,and7...I like Napoles over Griffith,Griffith over Rodriguez, and Rodriguez over Napoles! I know that I've have alot of holes in this...help me out with it. This isn't a legacy list strictly H2H.
And, even then, the only surefire reason to pick him over mantequilla is the latter's tendency to cut in some of his fights. Napoles would be a live, live dog against Tommy, though.