Who has the better wins froch or khan

Miguel2010 is a care in the community patient (with a mild case of Tourette's), today is a special day for Micheal as he's allowed to share his thoughts with all of us through the medium of internet......

 

You're one **** of a poster, you know.

Not really based on this alone, but all your other posts.

**** off :good

 

:deal

 

Power is irrelevant when you can't get your shots off.

 

Listen you **** ****. Why are you horrible and ****..?

I'm not a Khan Nut Hugger, i hardly mention him on here. You're argument is the shittiest argument i have ever witnessed in life. Amir Khan didn't even touch the canvas, he could of and probably and should of took a count.

But he wanted to prove a point, to his critics.

Amir Khan was hurt no doubt about it, but he stayed on his feet, weather the ropes helped him slightly or not. Amir Khan stayed on his feet, did'nt go down, and when the ref asked him......."Weather he was ok..?" he gestured with his gloves and nodded his head.

Amir Khan got allot of credit and respect for how he came back after that round.

Thats what being a warrior is about, how much you can take........and keep on moving.

If it was such a controversial round.....that you're trying to make out, he would not of been able to get off his stool for the 11th round.

It was the ****ing championship of the world, and Amir Khan was the WBA champion. A good referree, does not stop the fight until, the fighter is down and sparked out on the floor. Or is unable to defend himself, or protect himself.....

Amir Khan was on his bike. "Weather he was hurt, he was on his bike and trying to the best of his ability invade punches, then hold on".......

He still had that much sense about him, he wasn't just standing in one spot, taking blow after blow.

You ****ing **** ****.

 

Exactly. Khan did what only big punchers and bigger guys (than him) have managed.

He forced Judah to *****, AND scored a 'TKO' victory, at 140. I was wrong, I said it was bigger guys (with the exception of Tszyu) that forced Zab to wilt. With the correct execution, Khan made this redundant and forced the same results.

 

Froch's wins over Abraham and Pascal are more impressive than any victory that Khan has.

 

lol, Froch by a country mile.

 

Every opponent Froch fought was far past his best, or flat-footed blown-up Abraham who never fought anyone in a terribly shallow weak middleweight div...or no jab-no rythm Pascal...or Dirrell who beat him quite clearly, and every opponent Khan fought was far past his best apart from Maidana.

So Khan.

 

Pascal??!!??

 

Just edited.

He's ****. No jab, no rythm, no fundamental skill.

 

Still, it's a notable win, as he went on to be the lineal 175lb champ. he certainly has more to him than say, Paulie, probably the most useless fighter in many a year.

 

i think both there resumes are pretty close but froch has the edge due to the pascal win, all his other wins u can easily eliminate, he was made to look a fool by andre direll, taylor made his fame at 160 and what had abraham achieved at 168?

 

Yes, the correct answer right now is Froch.