Mayweather not on Sky

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by carrotcruncher, Jul 26, 2011.


  1. carrotcruncher

    carrotcruncher Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Oct 15, 2008
    September scrap with Ortiz not on sky, according to a whisper from the US. Anyone know more?
     
  2. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
  3. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    Primetime. Pretty much a disaster all round.

    Maybe we see Fury vs Rogan again on the same night and 5 used as an advertising tool for the PPV.
     
  4. modestbiggles

    modestbiggles Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,406
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    that will bomb.

    as big as he is, mayweather isn't going to get casuals to buy his fights en masse over here, on an obscure channel.

    especially as SSN won't promote it much.
     
  5. carrotcruncher

    carrotcruncher Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Oct 15, 2008

    As a Sky subscriber, I think this should be on Sky
     
  6. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    It's on Primetime??!!

    How on earth did they manager out-hussle Sky for that? Must have had something to do with Sky's fallout with GBP's other fighter, Khan. Massive props to Primetime for getting their hands on this fight.

    Will this be normal viewing or PPV?
     
  7. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    PPV of course.

    And I for one won't be buying.
     
  8. carrotcruncher

    carrotcruncher Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Oct 15, 2008

    Get real man. It's got to be bad news if the biggest fights are not on Sky. Personal 'fallouts' should not affect what I get for my subscription. I resent having to pay again for Prime which (as everybody more or less agrees) is inferior.
     
  9. tmsbry

    tmsbry #1 Full Member

    3,302
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    Source???? Mayweather's always had a good relationship with sky & he knows sky is britains version of HBO, he ain't moving over to no shitty primetime
     
  10. skellington

    skellington Bogbrush Full Member

    1,601
    0
    Aug 3, 2007
    I presume the parties involved pushed for PPV which Sky didn't want.
    That's the only reason it wouldn't be on Sky, so your subscription wouldn't cover it anyway.
     
  11. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    What difference does it make if it's on Sky PPV or Primeime PPV? You're still having to spill £15 for it. The benefit of this is that you don't have to be full-time subscriber to SkySports to get hold of this event. Anyone, Sky or non-Sky customers, can purchase it.
     
  12. carrotcruncher

    carrotcruncher Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Oct 15, 2008
    fair point ..... but surely sky could just pay more? GBP must realise that Mayweather v Amir or Pac would be five times as big on Sky.
     
  13. zabs

    zabs Member Full Member

    175
    0
    Apr 19, 2011
    See i agree that Khan ****ed up by going to prime time but its clear so did SKY. They pissed of the biggest promotional company in America and now they won't get the best fighters. We the customers loose but all in all for me it was a dick move by Sky for not accepting the Judah Khan fight when offerred by Khans team for regular Sky. Now they are paying for it. I for one am thinking of cancelling my sky subscription. Boxing was the main reason i've got it and now skys might not even have golden boy fights
     
  14. avo

    avo I Got Milk Baby!!! Full Member

    970
    1
    May 7, 2011
    why would mayweather be on box office when the mosley and marquez fights were on normal sky?
     
  15. dayoandy

    dayoandy Member Full Member

    155
    22
    May 24, 2008
    Chances are it wouldn't have been on Sky PPV so that is the big difference i guess. And the fact Primetime is ****