Holyfield, going away. Faced the other top fighters of the era when it mattered, and was never taken out early by second-raters.
Without a doubt? So I guess there's no doubt that he's better than Bowe despite the fact that he lost to him twice. No doubt that he's better than Lewis despite the fact that he lost to him too. Despite these losses, you can still make an argument for Holyfield. However, there would be plenty of doubters, and they would have good reason to doubt you.
He also lost to the other top fighters; losing to Moore, Lewis, and Bowe. He also lost to Ruiz the same year Lewis was caught with a lucky punch against Rahman.
Why do you still bother talking up holyfield over lewis when you and about 2 people in the world think yor right.:huh
Lou Duva said on Ringside Holyfield was the best heavyweight of the 90s. You can call him biased, but he is entitled to his opinion, and a lot of people agree with him.
Probably Bowe IMO. Tyson was on the slide, badly, by the 90's, and Lewis didnt peak till after the millenium IMO. Bowe was better than Holyfield, so Im going with Bowe. Head to head, at their best's Tyson Lewis/Bowe Holyfield
Lewis didn't peak until 2000 when he was 35? I don't think so. If that's the case, Bowe would have fought him in 1992 instead of publicly ducking him.