Erik Morales gets a title shot - no Anthony Crolla.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Samurai's Slice, Jul 27, 2011.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    Samurai's Slice, Jul 27, 2011
    Samurai's Slice, Jul 27, 2011
    #1
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Depends which version of Morales shows up.
     
    eze, Jul 27, 2011
    eze, Jul 27, 2011
    #2
  3. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    PS: This will be the fourth division title!
     
    Samurai's Slice, Jul 27, 2011
    Samurai's Slice, Jul 27, 2011
    #3
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    It won't mean much vs a guy who's never been above 135.
     
    eze, Jul 27, 2011
    eze, Jul 27, 2011
    #4
  5. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    Morales has the potential to be great, even at age 34 he has a good punch, not saying willie limond is special, but Morales has a bad body shot on the inside, proofed in that fight. He put up a good KO. He can do well in the future.
     
    Samurai's Slice, Jul 27, 2011
    Samurai's Slice, Jul 27, 2011
    #5
  6. fan johnny

    fan johnny Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Apr 7, 2011
    BS! BS! BS! and more BS! how the hell is Barrios fighting for a vacant title when WBC hasn't even identified the mandatory for Bradley? The freak'n rule say he has 180 days from when they inform him of a mandator defense or be stripped. So if you accept the decision to take the belt from Bradley it should be the #1 faces the #2 or #3. Not a lightweight not even ranked.
     
    fan johnny, Jul 27, 2011
    fan johnny, Jul 27, 2011
    #6
  7. Grillinnap

    Grillinnap Flomos are morons Full Member

    6,312
    0
    Dec 1, 2009
    Sulaiman, you ****ing ****.
     
    Grillinnap, Jul 27, 2011
    Grillinnap, Jul 27, 2011
    #7
  8. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Weird fight, especially for a title belt...but EM by UD.
     
    JMP, Jul 28, 2011
    JMP, Jul 28, 2011
    #8
  9. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Damn this crap, the WBA try to get Morales a fake title, now the WBC.
     
    FORMIDABLE, Jul 28, 2011
    FORMIDABLE, Jul 28, 2011
    #9
  10. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,744
    29,687
    Jan 18, 2010
    You can't classify this as a mismatch, but a titlefight?! :blood
    Morales TKO
     
    Robney, Jul 28, 2011
    Robney, Jul 28, 2011
    #10
  11. puertorricane

    puertorricane Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,242
    3
    Jan 25, 2010
    Is a sham if it take place but the mexicans will still claim him as a four division champ.

    :hat
     
    puertorricane, Jul 28, 2011
    puertorricane, Jul 28, 2011
    #11
  12. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    22
    Dec 12, 2009
    Erik should have already been a 4 weight division when he got robbed againt Diaz. But FYI i wont be acknowledging this title if he happens to win.

    Either way, WAR TERRIBLE!!!!! :ibutt
     
    Zopilote, Jul 28, 2011
    Zopilote, Jul 28, 2011
    #12
  13. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Much better fight than Crolla.
     
    PBFred, Jul 28, 2011
    PBFred, Jul 28, 2011
    #13
  14. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Its good but it shouldnt be for a title, in the end this will end up with khan giving morales a beating and I dont want to see it.
     
    cesare-borgia, Jul 28, 2011
    cesare-borgia, Jul 28, 2011
    #14
  15. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    Good for Morales he deserves to be the first Mexican to win four division titles since hes the only one to "beat" Manny once.
     
    GTSK, Jul 28, 2011
    GTSK, Jul 28, 2011
    #15
Page 1 of 2