I just posted in General about khan doing a 3.1 rating on HBO, the yanks said that means 3 million, these numbers are huige considering guys like canelo and chavez do 1-1.5 million, cotto did 1.7 million against Foreman, Pretty impressive imo.
Its not 3.1m viewers.Cotto/Foreman for instance had a rating of 3.9 which equalled about 1.9m viewers. Khan/Judah had a little over a million.
It depends 1 percentage point also equates to around 1 million viewers in US TV ratings, but HBO is on cable so is probably lower.
http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/measurement/television-measurement.html That’s the major system for tracking TV viewers in the US. I’m not sure if that’s what they use for HBO, but it basically measures a cross-section of US TV viewers across the country, the percentage that viewed that and then they calculate the rating from that. The other way I’ve heard of is they look at the total amount of people with access to HBO on cable who watched it. So, if 30m people in the US have HBO, and 3.1 watched it, then I think your calculation would be 900,000 people watched it. Which sounds more realistic than 3m, which very few HBO shows get, never mind boxing.
3 million would be ridiculously high. Pascal vs Hopkins did 1.8m and Alvarez and Chavez only get 1.6m
They should just release they actual figure, ratings are calculated differently, not sure what method they used to get 3.1.
I'm pretty sure it's a percentage point of the total audience available to HBO on that given night. So it's wildly unreliable until you know the baseline. I hate these proprietary measurement systems.