The Offical Joe Calzaghe Question of the Century

Obviously I don't mean everyone.

Ok maybe i'm going a bit over the top by reading some of the posts on this forum. I should realize that this forum has their fair share of biased idiots and not base it on the general public

 

yeah, cause i'm pretty sure that the general public doesn't have the fondness for upskirt pictures like people on this forum do.

 

Yeah, well, don't forget Tarver, though...:hey

 

i disagree.

that was the case ,but after the kessler fight world opinion has changed on calzaghe.

even in america.

not everybody , every fighter has critics , be they american or from the rest of the world.

an american saying a european does not do reseach is taking the ****.

australians/european/british/etc etc post in the general boxing forum where all american boxing debate and fighters take place.

except for a handfull of posters on esb like diamondave/marting/augutus
the european/british/australian sections of esb is devoid of any american poster doing research and finding out about foreign fighters.

the reason is obvious ,90% of american fight fans do not give a **** about fighters or fights that happen outside there borders being a very insular country when it comes to sports and the usual he is a bum/overated is trotted out on fighters they have not seen or do not want to see, happy in there own comfort zone that america is best.

 

2 things. 1. an american saying a european does not do research is facetiously pointing out your sadly pedestrian bias (sad, so sad) 2. in america, **** means urine, and i don't drink urine, do they do that where you're from? cause that's bad for you you know, urine is not for drinking.

really? do 100% of europeans usually make their argument with made up statistics? i'm just curious so if in the future i get into another discussion with an anti-american ****-drinker i will know what to expect

cheers!

 

False champion...showing himself with the IBF belt on recent picture...

 

I think Joe needs to fight Taylor or Pavlik if they will go up to SMW or maybe Dawson, Woods or Erdei at LHW.

A win over BHOP and everybody wil say BHOP is over the hill so it wont count.

Problem is that Joe has already fought and beat the best world prospect at SMW and now he will smash the rings number 1 in BHOP at LHW....but he needs a huge fight but against who?

 

phillyshell wrote

you yourself say it on another thread and now you say i make it up.

 

yes. because i made it up. c'mon man, it's not like this is difficult. also, i was referring to the supposed bias that americans have against britain (that's a country), not how americans view fighters of other nationalities. it's ok, reading and understanding is hard.

 

Is this a trick question?
... and are you also questioning their intelligence?