Hatton vs Cotto prime for prime at 140, who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rob887, Jul 31, 2011.


  1. Rob887

    Rob887 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,546
    0
    May 14, 2011
    Hatton vs Cotto prime for prime at 140, who wins?
     
  2. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    140 Cotto would get rocked, I see Hatton taking a close UD
     
  3. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Hatton, Cotto was not as solid at 140 and hates being pressured
     
  4. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    Kneegal wins this easy against the face first no head movement brawler from Brit.
     
  5. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,283
    4
    Jul 26, 2008
    Hatton would be banging Cotto's dehydrated body all night long. Cotto's best is at 147, and has problems at 140, while Ricky is undefeated at 140 (except pac). Cotto might win rounds in the first 6 rounds through effective jabs and right hooks, but, as the rounds came to close, Ricky's persistent body shots would take toll.

    Hatton KO10 Cotto. I see him kneeling before the 140 king.
     
  6. sbbigmike

    sbbigmike Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,847
    0
    Apr 15, 2010
    People forget how good prime Hatton was. Hatton KO early.
     
  7. KMSTAR

    KMSTAR Member Full Member

    286
    0
    May 12, 2006
    Tough to call at 140 (obviously not at 147) but I have to go Cotto. He was chinny at 140, but with his uncle in his corner he employed better technique and packed a bigger punch than Hatton.
     
  8. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010

    :lol: Cool story bro.
     
  9. Poirot

    Poirot Active Member Full Member

    1,216
    0
    Nov 13, 2008
    - Around 2005/06 - I say Hatton over Cotto
    - His chin was legendary, especially in that Tsyzu fight
    - Then his bad lifestyle outside the ring and fighting style (involving suffering far too much punishment) just caught up with Hatton.
     
  10. ViktorVaughn

    ViktorVaughn Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,924
    0
    Jul 18, 2008
    I'd say Hatton by decision. At 147 Cotto no doubt but at 140 Hatton style would have been bad for Cotto.
     
  11. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,128
    Oct 17, 2009
    Great fight, I think Cotto stops him by getting the best of him on the outside behind a jab early, and struggling but overpowering him on the inside by landing the heavier cleaner blows, which take their toll down the line.
     
  12. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    I can't call it. It would be a lot of fun while it lasted.
     
  13. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,050
    6,261
    Jan 22, 2009
    :goodYup
     
  14. Loggo

    Loggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,029
    2
    Mar 26, 2006
    i`d have Hatton winning points at 140 and drawing at 147 because he pushed Mayweather a lot more than a lot of Mayweathers previous opponents and i can`t see Cotto doing better against Mayweather than Hatton did.(Esp with the firm and unfair ref).
     
  15. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,128
    Oct 17, 2009
    Well, Cotto is a boxer-puncher pressure fighter, not a straight up infighter. He boxes behind the jab and closes the distance to get his mid-range hooks off to the body and head; he can fight off the chest at close quarters, but he prefers to switch it up between the three distance points. Hatton loves to get right in there and bury his head while working the body. He gave Mayweather a good fight, but Cotto would do it differently himself. Therefore, Cotto and Hatton wouldn't be going at each other with the same exact tactics.