My Scoring for the Pavlik-Martinez Robbery

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beatle, Aug 3, 2011.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    don't feed the troll
     
  2. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    What kind of bizarre logic is, "I can see Martinez winning by a point, but that shouldn't cause Pavlik to lose his title"?

    If you're the champ, and you lose the fight by a point - you've lost the fight. And if you lose the fight, you lose the title. The robbery would be giving the champion some kind of head start just because he's the champion.
     
  3. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  4. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    100%.
     
  5. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Martinez leathered Pavlik so yes I can see how a draw would be a fair result...
     
  6. COLD-HARD-TRUTH

    COLD-HARD-TRUTH Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    8
    Sep 21, 2008
    I thought Martinez clearly won the fight but wasn't dominant. Pavlik landing some really hard punches and hurt Martinez at times... the most painful thing about that fight to me was that it was a winnable won for Pavlik had he thrown to the body. Jack Loew has really hampered Pavlik's career and made him way to one dimensional. "Double the jab, throw the right hand"... well that works on some guys but not against movers like Martinez.
     
  7. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
    :lol::lol:
    I once said it was onesided but after watching it again i take it back. I had Pavlik winning four rounds plus that bs KD its 115 - 112
     
  8. TheDon

    TheDon KO Artist Full Member

    3,434
    1
    Apr 19, 2008
    Is this thread serious? Pavlik deserved a draw? Even if Martinez won by a point on the cards, the judges should have thought "**** that Pavlik's American, we change our verdict to a draw"???? :blood
     
  9. irishny

    irishny Obsessed with Boxing banned

    15,119
    10
    May 8, 2009
    And of course all real boxing fans dont like seeing champs getting "the benefit of the doubt"...right??

    I mean, its completely unfair and antiquated
     
  10. Brownies

    Brownies Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,776
    8
    Aug 16, 2010
    I don't believe the OP is serious.
     
  11. WatchfortheHook

    WatchfortheHook Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,944
    0
    Feb 24, 2010
    This fight was extremely easy to score. It was either 115-112 or 115-111 depending on if you gave Martinez a 10-8 (no knockdown) round for round 9.
     
  12. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Whoooop whoooop :nut
     
  13. Predicto

    Predicto Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,435
    0
    Oct 15, 2008
    :yep:huh
     
  14. RustBelt

    RustBelt The Pride Of Youngstown Full Member

    4,586
    1
    Apr 6, 2011
    Pavlik lost Clearly! 115-112 is just fine with me! Pavlik was up 1 point after 8 i think. The fight was more competitive then what people made it seem like Martinez Dominated!

    People See Blood and a fighters face and assume He got his ass beat, Thats not always the case!
     
  15. antonio8904

    antonio8904 Atheist Full Member

    6,138
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    WTF??? This is bollocks! Martinez clearly won, and I was a Pavlik fan at the time.

    In the middle rounds Pavlik finally came alive, he started to time Martinez and caught him and dropped him. I thought Pavlik would get a late TKO but he instead he got cut and Martinez bagged the next 4 rounds making him the CLEAR winner easily.