Should there be a distinction between a victory by cuts and by TKO

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by awesome1612, Aug 3, 2011.


  1. awesome1612

    awesome1612 Guest

    TKO usually always implies that the ref had to jump in to save the fighter from a barrage of punches that the fighter simply could not defend himself with meaning the fighter was simply just being dominated and outboxed.

    One example of where this goes wrong is the Vitali Klitschko - Lennox Lewis fight. Vitali was the one who was dominating and outboxing Lewis and by many boxing experts and fans was thought to win the fight in the later rounds. His loss is labeled as "TKO" but this is really not the case.

    And there are distinctions already made in boxing, I don't see why "Cuts" can't be added in? Besides TKO and KO, RTD is a distinction used for being retired by the corner. Thus, a fight stopped by the doctor's advice should be a victory by Cuts or it can be abbreviated to look cool.
     
  2. awesome1612

    awesome1612 Guest

    Oh and I, of course, voted yes
     
  3. Libertine

    Libertine Active Member Full Member

    821
    427
    Sep 2, 2010
    Yes, but well done in using a terrible example
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    No. A loss is a loss. A stoppage on cuts already has a label, it's TKO.

    And yes, Vitali really did lose. Punches made the cut. Punched made it worse. Punches stopped it.
     
  5. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    I think it would be nice to have it noted somewhere on sites that have wins/losses. But a cut stoppage is a TKO, the ref determined the fighter could not defend himself, due to the cut/s.
     
  6. Rangersfan1982

    Rangersfan1982 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,832
    1
    May 28, 2009
    Get over it you sad ****.
     
  7. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    :thumbsup
     
  8. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008

    :deal

    jesus, get over Vitali getting owned by fat old ass out of shape Lewis already, knew this thread had an agenda......
     
  9. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,724
    4,429
    Dec 5, 2010
    If a fight is stopped on cuts it should be ruled a Technical Decision (TD), not a TKO.
     
  10. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    2,381
    0
    Jul 12, 2011
    THe example is so bad I won't vote.
     
  11. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    No. Fans can remember the details behind a stoppage to detemine when a rematch is warranted. In your example, it was warranted. It's still a TKO.
     
  12. Ding

    Ding Champ Full Member

    972
    0
    May 2, 2006

    :deal
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,070
    35,189
    Jun 23, 2005
    Great post I agree.
     
  14. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    4,504
    0
    Jun 1, 2011
    Vitali was not dominating Lewis. A fight is 12 rounds, and predicting Vitali wins late is just that, a prediction. The problem with what you're saying is that the cuts weren't caused by himself. Lennox caused the cuts.
     
  15. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    No, TKO stands for technical knockout.

    This is when one fighter continuing the bout would be unsafe, be it because of obtuse cuts or inability to defend himself.