I got a "good" feeling that Tito will do well on January 19th...... Whether this equates to a WIN, not sure, but I KNOW Roy will not engage, which will be a shame since he's fighting a smaller man...... As far as who I'm rooting for, look to the LEFT:yep :yep
Round 1: Jones comes out fainting and posing throwing jabs. After about 30 seconds of nothing but faints and foot movement, Jones comes in with a combination that lands clean and whooos the crowd. Tito is bouncing, throwing the occasional jab. Tito comes in with a left hook that backs Jones up against the ropes and he goes to work. Jones takes some shots on the arms and legs and then ties up. Back to the middle of the ring. more faints and moving by Jones, ends the round with another combination on Tito. Round 1: Jones Somebody else do Round 2 :good Tito is getting dropped in round 2, but gets up and finishes the round.
RJJ knocks Tito the **** out. Which round depends on how aggressive RJJ decides to be. Can't wait to see Tito's ass on the canvas and watching RJJ celebrate a win.
I've been saying this since the fight was announced. You are a smart person. Keep doing it so I don't have to. lol.
I think most fans realize that RJJ is going to win. But how he wins is of most importance. If he comes out aggressive and flashes that blazing hand speed and puts together whithering combinations right off the bat, a lot of people will get back on his bandwagon. And talks of him fighting Joe C, Dawson, Tarver, Hopkins, Johnson, etc will be all over the place. And i think rightfully so. RJJ problem is more mental than physical. If he's willing to trade, he can beat a lot of people IMO.
I'll go with Tito hoping that his left hook is still as strong and fast as before. is hard to tell how he will win, if he does. You don't have to be a power puncher sometimes is not how hard you punch but when and where will land :huh
You know presscot, I dislike you more and more with every post you put up. But, since you have been here longer. I'll just let you dig the hole your standing in.