more dangerous fight for floyd...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Exactly
     
    Steenalized, Aug 12, 2011
    Steenalized, Aug 12, 2011
    #16
  2. Flatlander

    Flatlander Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,481
    96
    Mar 11, 2005
    Timothy Bradley
     
    Flatlander, Aug 12, 2011
    Flatlander, Aug 12, 2011
    #17
  3. Rangersfan1982

    Rangersfan1982 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,832
    1
    May 28, 2009
    :rofl
     
    Rangersfan1982, Aug 12, 2011
    Rangersfan1982, Aug 12, 2011
    #18
  4. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    dodong, Aug 12, 2011
    dodong, Aug 12, 2011
    #19
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    can someone actually give the reasons why pacquiao is more dangerous of a fight than khan when according to puertorricane, khan is more younger, the naturally bigger guy and the faster fighter?
     
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    #20
  6. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    This is my vote if it was an opition. I think Mayweather wins at 154.
     
    ripcity, Aug 12, 2011
    ripcity, Aug 12, 2011
    #21
  7. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Pac has better footwork, punch placement and the power to actually hurt Mayweather and make him pay for any mistakes.
     
    DDDUUDDDEE, Aug 12, 2011
    DDDUUDDDEE, Aug 12, 2011
    #22
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    it's not an option and floyd won't fight him either. floyd said he wanted the winner of william-martinez but proceeds to fight ortiz. also at 154, i don't think martinez is a much risky fght for floyd than pacquiao at 147.
     
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    #23
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    If the Question is who is better overall Pacquiao or Khan and who will be better overall mid 2012. The answer is an easy one Pacquiao is and will be the better boxer. However, Styles make fights. At least that is the saying. Pacquiao's style is made for Mayweather. He's going to come right at him and be open for counters. Pacquiao's defense can be best described as above avrage. I'm not arguing that Khan is better than Pacquiao or that he is a great threat to beat Mayweather. He however has advantages that Pacquiao dose not have. The first is he's tall with long arms. That is always an advantage in boxing. Next and this is probbly more important than his size. After all size is only an advantage if you use it. Khan is more of a pure boxer than Pacquiao is. When are going to learn that swarming Mayweather dose not work?
    I don't expect Mayweather to have any real problems with either Pacquiao or Khan. Expect for getting Pacquiao in the ring with him.
     
    ripcity, Aug 12, 2011
    ripcity, Aug 12, 2011
    #24
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    true.
     
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    #25
  11. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    :rofl at Khan being a more dangerous fight for Floyd than Manny is.
     
    Thread Stealer, Aug 12, 2011
    Thread Stealer, Aug 12, 2011
    #26
  12. jmmpbf

    jmmpbf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    0
    Aug 25, 2010
    Pacquiao might have lost step(s) by then..and Khan might have improved significantly.

    Only time will tell..
     
    jmmpbf, Aug 12, 2011
    jmmpbf, Aug 12, 2011
    #27
  13. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    Obviously it's Pac, but I wouldn't be surprised if some *****s would say Khan. After all, Khan is also a YOUNG HUNGRY LION.
     
    tinorknitz, Aug 12, 2011
    tinorknitz, Aug 12, 2011
    #28
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    there was once a thread back in 2008 asking if who would win between gamboa and pac if they fight a year later. i'm sure most old timer know who the thread starter is and he also thinks highly of gamboa saying gamboa would beat pacman in 2009 but not enough to beat a supernatural in joan guzman. :lol:

    but i got what you're saying. pac is not exactly a fresh fighter and could in any time now drop his game significantly especially with his fighting style.
     
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    puga_ni_nana, Aug 12, 2011
    #29
  15. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    Sergio and thats because he thinks in the ring and is not so robotic plus he's bigger, nice speed and power, plus he's a lefty.

    I alway thought the fighter to beat Floyd will hold natural physical strenthgs such as length and size....i think its harder for smaller guys or guys around is size to beat him because he has freakish arm length for his size coupled with everything else he has and does.
     
    igotJUIC3, Aug 12, 2011
    igotJUIC3, Aug 12, 2011
    #30
Page 2 of 2