Hamed (Ingle Gym) vs Pacquiao at Featherweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by iron_chin, Aug 15, 2011.


  1. hent

    hent Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Jun 30, 2011
    Naz only trained 5 weeks for the Kelley fight. He had personal problems leading up to the fight as well. Also he completely abandones the gameplan he was given as he wasnted to put on a good show for his first time in the US and prove to Kelly that he was the better puncher. The KDs were balance issures more than anything. He was still with Ingle at this point but there were massive problems in the camp.
     
  2. Galaxy

    Galaxy Member Full Member

    364
    0
    Feb 12, 2006
    the legend of "ingle gym hamed", a mythical figure that exist in the hearts and minds of his uk fans.
     
  3. Masamune

    Masamune Active Member Full Member

    1,042
    3
    Nov 13, 2010
    Under Brendan Ingle naz was focused , disciplined and freakishly powerful - dont get it twisted with the lazy celebrity Naz that lost to Barerra , that was a charicature of the real hamed and he deserved his arse kicking .

    Its not impossible to think Naz would be capable of knocking out manny at 126 pounds - anything over 130 and manny beats him like a ginger step child.
     
  4. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Pacquiao by stoppage or UD.
     
  5. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    :lol:You're joking right?This is another wind up thread,right?Ok,reality time.
    Kevin Kelley:In the 2 1/2 years leading up to the Hamed fight,was stopped once and drew twice by fighters whose names you or I will never remember.In other words,past it and NOWHERE NEAR elite at that point.
    Tom Johnson:33 when he fought Hamed and drew just a fight or 2 before facing Hamed and lost again just a couple of fights after fighting Hamed.In other words,past it and NOWHERE NEAR elite at that point.
    Vasquez:At least 36 when he fought Hamed and with 7 losses already to his credit.In other words,NOWHERE NEAR elite at that point.
    Bungu:Even though he had fought once or twice at featherweight earlier in his career,when he fought Hamed,it was his 1st foray as a full fledged and permanent featherweight.Why is that significant?Because in 2 of the 3 fights immediately preceding the Hamed fight,he won a split decision and a majority decision(against Danny Romero,a pretty good 122 pounder).In other words,he was NEVER AN ELITE featherweight.
    Marco Antonio Barrera D 12 Naseem Hamed in Hamed's 1st fight against an elite featherweight.Hamed has a decent resume against some pretty good alphabet beltholders,but the actual 1st time Hamed fought an elite,he was comprehensively outboxed.By the way,is there anyone out there that believes that Kelley,Bungu,Vasquez or Johnson were anywhere near MAB's level?Just curious.
     
  6. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    :lol:Even more Hamed excuses.It's astonishing how you Hamed supporters can make so many.I believe that you Hamed supporters don't even believe that you're making excuses:lol::lol:
     
  7. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    LOLOLOL Hamed "Ingle Gym" version is prime Hamed.

    Face it, at 27 years old Hamed faced something he had no answer for - an elite boxer. If his "prime days" where years before then Hamed is more limited than I thought.


    He was good. Just not in the same level as the 4 greats of his time (MAB, JMM, EM and Pac).

    No matter how you slice it, dice it, **** on it, eat it, **** it, **** it... Hamed loses to every time against those 4 greats - 9 out of 10 (punchers chance).
     
  8. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    3
    Oct 30, 2005

    Thank you. It's so convenient that the Ingle version of Hamed happily coincides with the timeframe before Hamed stepped up opposition. Maybe if Jeff Lacy had changed trainers prior to Calzaghe and then retired after that fight, people could say the same thing about him. :rasta
     
  9. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006

    I could have believed you except that Pac is a southpaw!!!!!


    Jesus!!!!! That is why I hate ESB. Full of dumb idiots!
     
  10. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Naz is too small!!!!!
     
  11. vnyc

    vnyc Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,078
    638
    Nov 8, 2009
  12. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Pac by stoppage at the least. Both had destructive power, only one could hang with the elite.
     
  13. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,991
    6,971
    May 18, 2006
    Hamed is a good fighter but unproven at the elite level. He loss his first fight at the elite level and quit. Pac kept fighting even after losing to Morales and twice to Marquez.That's the difference.Who knows what he could have done had he kept fighting the likes of Marquez and Morales. Trilogy with Morales or a 2 fight series with Marquez. Is he capable of beating the two? he has the power to drop the 2 that's for sure.
     
  14. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    11,894
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    @ the TS: Good question! I'd go with Pac in this one. There are plenty of ways one could over analyze this fight but in the end the simplest way of putting it is that Pac could take the Prince's punch better then the Prince could take Pac's punches.
     
  15. stewy

    stewy Active Member Full Member

    1,281
    0
    May 15, 2010
    Pac by murder
    i have had the absolute displeasure of meeting naz...****in pig of a human