mayweather vs pac whoos ducking who (100% PROOF VIDEO)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DEFoverOFE99%, Aug 14, 2011.


  1. DEFoverOFE99%

    DEFoverOFE99% Active Member Full Member

    874
    0
    Apr 7, 2010
    As i thought no one took the time to look at my video and decided to just flame instead (no intelligent debate:-() and once again i proved that if a ts spells a word incorrectly or phonetically the forum turns into a english class im was sitting here wit a buddy when i posted this and bet him i could predict 3/4 of post content if i spelled a few words wrong. So to all u ****s that post stupid **** like what i don't understand your spelling sucks what's this mean bla bla i just owned all of by making u reply to my post the way i knew u would

    ****ing owned

    now do your self a favor and watch the ****ing video allot of interesting facts read my statements in between pause if u have to to keep up on the reading.
     
  2. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  3. PaRappaSan

    PaRappaSan Member Full Member

    222
    0
    Jan 4, 2007
    :rofl
     
  4. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,920
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    That vid is well put together. Interesting indeed.
     
  5. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,755
    2
    Mar 10, 2011
    Now queue the cats that come up with a way to criticize you for baiting them, be prepared to be called pathetic, and not give a ****.
     
  6. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Video is from Maestroboxing. I suspect Maestroboxing is Michiganwarrior.

    Here's another one of his videos:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSpFTyhzu1o[/ame]
     
  7. mr. piff

    mr. piff The Ring General Full Member

    3,992
    1
    Mar 17, 2010
    I just cant get enough of that:rofl

    BTW TS is correct - you all were to caught up in the messenger than the message itself :lol:
     
  8. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    4,504
    0
    Jun 1, 2011
    Of course you do you sack of ****:rofl. Who am I again:lol:
     
  9. mudpunch

    mudpunch Member Full Member

    142
    0
    Apr 16, 2011
    This content is protected
     
  10. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
  11. DEFoverOFE99%

    DEFoverOFE99% Active Member Full Member

    874
    0
    Apr 7, 2010
    That is pretty ****ing funny man

    but that is pretty much how it went down n e ways some one pleas debate this video with out flaming now I am a $ may fan obviously but I m also a pac fan but most of all a fan of boxing I know I have a tendency to go overboard I.E.. NUTHUGGING $MAY but most of the time I am taking it to the next level do to the FACT that it is the only way to get n e kind of feed back whatsoever so I make a valid point and exaggerate said point just to get the rare intelligent (debate/feedback) cause if I just make a fair and balanced post looking to start a engaging respectfully debate it just gets buried so I add a little controversy i.e. exaggerated bias towards $ may and the flaming begins keeping the thread alive just long enough to get a few good replys.

    So that's the method to my madness and that said I would really like some (none flaming) feed back on this post I.E.. Some one to break down and debate the video cause in all honesty I feel the video even though it appears anti pac it is actually just a video that states facts and is put together to hi light the difference in career paths between $ may and pac and even though it appears bias towards $ may the facts don't lie and IMHO there is very little if any distortion.

    Anyways pleas discuss
     
  12. C.Oblak23

    C.Oblak23 Member Full Member

    264
    0
    May 10, 2009
    Honestly, it's tough to read your posts. I'm not used to reading single sentences that are a paragraph long. If you want people to engage, you have to make your posts readable. You can't expect educated responses to what your presenting.
     
  13. HANCOCK

    HANCOCK Member Full Member

    168
    0
    Dec 29, 2009
  14. DEFoverOFE99%

    DEFoverOFE99% Active Member Full Member

    874
    0
    Apr 7, 2010

    well then y post at all i understand bashing gramer spelling puncuation to a extent but this i dont under stand wut u wrote cause u did not us . , ect is rediculous bash the content if u dont agree but not the dilivery system of said content
     
  15. LatinKing416

    LatinKing416 Guest