Are you for or Against Catch Weight fights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JohnAnthony, Aug 25, 2011.


  1. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    oops, i voted for yes, when i meant to say no:oops:
     
  2. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    I think it depends on the situation. But for the most part, having a ridiculous amount of weight-classes already should fulfill the purpose of finding compromising weights which both parties can agree to.
     
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    :deal:thumbsup
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    it is not about the guys it is about the sport. 20 years after most guys fight they say their opponents were the best who ever fought. Why wouldn't they? Hagler is going to say Hearns was the best ever and Hearns about Hagler and Chavez about Whitaker. It is about boxing and putting two guys who are tops together. Finding a way for guys to fight is too much away from boxing.
     
  5. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    Dont like catchweights and most likely never will, rarely do you see both guys benifit from the new limit, you either get a larger drained fighter or a smaller bloated fighter, usually you find one guy has been completely ****ed due to the new limit. catchweights should only be found in warm up fights and should certainly not be found in title fights.
     
  6. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Loyal Member banned Full Member

    30,117
    7,047
    May 18, 2006
    As long as it's reasonable i have no problem with it.Fighters these days get's to rehydrate and don't come in weighing the

    same on fight night as what they weighed on the scale anyway.Weak excuse! NEXT!!
     
  7. SupraTT24

    SupraTT24 Heart Of A Champion Full Member

    638
    1
    Jan 18, 2006
    I have said this for a long time but if i can ever unify the titles, im gonna have someone bring a trashcan into the ring while they do my interview on HBO and im gonna throw all the belts in the garbage and walk out of the ring without a word. This is a dream of mine
     
  8. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    co-mutha****in'-sign

    Only time I don't have a problem with catchweights is when two fighter are separated by two divisions(like Paq and JMM) and they use the catchweight to meet in the middle(not like Paq and JMM). But definitley not during championship fights. But if you are separated by one division and you wanna fight for a title in the weight above you then you need to be a ****in' man and challenge the champion at his weight class period(like Hatton/Floyd and Floyd/Oscar). If you can't make the weight then keep your ass in your own division.
     
  9. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    Yes, im not against catchweight fights, as long as its not for a title..
     
  10. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    catch weights have always been there but never made an issue of

    Jones Koed Hill and both weighted over 175lbs officially

    it was still a lightheavy weight fight

    these super and junior divisions are catchweights themselves

    SRR weighed 149lbs and fought Lamotta . jake weighed 161 and a half pounds for a MIDDLEWEIGHT fight

    this has never been unusual until the premaddonnas today make it an issue, its a meal here or there
     
  11. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Loyal Member banned Full Member

    30,117
    7,047
    May 18, 2006
    As long as you are not asking a fighter to come up/down from their weight class too much then it's reasonable.
     
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    119
    Jun 30, 2008
    Neither. I'd rather have the two fighters fight at the actual weight, but catchweights have existed in the sport for a long time, even for titles. It certainly isn't disrespecting the sport's history to have them.
     
  13. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Not a fan when world titles are on the line.
     
  14. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    right-


    it just wasnt called "catch weight"

    Jones Hill was announced as a lt HW fight even tho both were over

    Same for corrales Clottey ww fight

    both 149
     
  15. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    Im against them especially if there is a title at stake.