Greatest Fighter of the 2000s

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nigel_Benn, Sep 7, 2011.


  1. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    fair enough
     
  2. nire1982

    nire1982 Member Full Member

    462
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    ****ing idiot :rofl
     
  3. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
  4. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    You dont wonder why you are in the minority of this argument? look at the poll, floyds accomplishments in boxing are good and he is the most skilled boxer of that decade, but pacs achievements are better, he defeated better oposition, climbed trough more divisions.
    Had floyd no retired and continued his good run from 130/135 on to 147 with excellent opposition then he would be the man, but since that didnt happen history will see pac as the more accomplished boxer of that decade.
     
  5. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    Ripcity is biased and a Floyd lover. Remember when Ripcity favors Mosley over Pacquiao. After the fight you will never see a post of him giving props.
     
  6. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    Duran and SLR have not been subject to test, I guess because of this, they are not ATG.:patsch
     
  7. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,199
    6,445
    Jan 22, 2009
  8. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Pac, of course
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    No I don't wonder. That dose not mean they/you are right. People vote for Pacquiao not out of logic and facts, but because they like him better.
    As far as time goes Mayweather will be more apreacitaed as a boxer. Presurefighters/brawlers are always more popular than pure boxers. If this was the 70's you'd be telling me that Duran was more acomplished than Leonard, the late 80's early 90's that Chavez is more acomplished than Whitaker. History has been kinder to Leonard and Whitaker.
    " but pacs achievements are better, he defeated better oposition, climbed trough more divisions." The only way to describe this statment is Total bull****. I've explaned many times here (esb) why Mayweather has defeated better oposition. Just check out their boxrec profiles. Don't just look at the big names who Mayweather has fought better than Pacquiao, let alone beat. As far as climbing through the ranks. Am I suposed to be impresed that he was an oversized flyweight or that he ussed his poistion to get two bougus championships in catchweight fight for 147 & 154 championships?
     
  10. Reilence

    Reilence Grepolis Mania Full Member

    1,474
    0
    Apr 29, 2006
    WTF? Pac is the right answer here. I don't know why you idiots are voting for someone else.
     
  11. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Great™ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    Manny Pacquiao by a mile.
     
  12. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    Manny's the man here :good
     
  13. FakeBlood

    FakeBlood CEO @ Fight Club Full Member

    1,052
    0
    May 10, 2010
    I voted on the basis of who I believe to be the P4P best on that list.

    That would be Floyd Mayweather.
     
  14. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Pac by a longshot. Floyd would be in the running if he took more challenges more often.
     
  15. MrOliverKlozoff

    MrOliverKlozoff The guy in shades Full Member

    1,482
    6
    Mar 12, 2011

    We have a new definition of insanity. Congrats.