but its called arse kissing and nobody wants to see that mans an egomentalist surrounded by yes men who laugh at all his crap little jokes, its why he threw his toys out the pram as soon as somebody asked him a question he didnt particularly like its not like merchant went 'so floyd you little gayboy, that was pathetic and cowardly wasnt it?' in which case floyd going mental is fair enough, he asked the question in a reasonable enough manner, floyd just didnt want to get asked that question
Floyd didn't like the fact that he cheap shotted someone and had to answer it. He was dying to run to the safety off his pack for some lurve. Merchant is Merchant. He's been asking prickish post fight questions for 25 years.
yep. I remember in the build up to Haye vs Enzo David Haye said "Boxing is the lonliest sport in the world. you don't need all your friends around saying Oh david you look great, thats why its just me and adam" as soon as he added the 15th massouse he went to ****.
Very true, Robert. In fact, Id point more to the instant you have your own magazine, you might want to reconsider your priorities.
Larry should have asked "was your wife's guard down like that when you slapped her? or did she illegally block it with the back of her shoulder?" :!:
why is everyone acting like floyd was pysically threatening merchant? its not like he was going to hit him or anything.. and please.. he did not "square up" to him.
Ok you cant find A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A, all the time. What was the point of Ali facing E. Shavers? What was the point in Foreman fighting Norton who had just lost a close one to Ali. What was the point in Tyson fighting Holyfield...Holy was shot right? Your the partially to blame for boxing lack of evolution compared to other sports. The sport from a skill perspective hasnt advanced since the 70s/80s....that just **** in reality. Fighting Berto, Cotto, Margs they are fights worth watching get out their often. Tyson foughts this- 1986 Nov Berbick WBC 1987 Mar J. Smith WBC, WBA May P. Thomas WBC, WBA Aug T. Tucker WBC, WBA, IBF Oct T. Biggs WBC, WBA, IBF 1988 Jan L. Holmes WBC, WBA, IBF Mar T. Tubbs WBC, WBA, IBF Jun M. Spinks WBC, WBA, IBF, Lineal Less than 2 years he fought 8 times...to be exact in 20 months. Im sure mr smarty pants would suggest this instead in keeping with modern day boxing- 1986 Nov Berbick WBC, WBA 1987 Mar J. Smith WBC, WBA Aug T. Tucker WBC, WBA, IBF 1988 Jun M. Spinks WBC, WBA, IBF Yeah lets forget Thomas, Biggs, Holmes, Tubbs whats the point **** fights right. You only become better by doing something often and at a high level.
Even that is too much, forget his missus would she really be with him if he wasnt a sportsmen....dad, trainer and conditioning coach.
He needed to answer for ****. He done nothing wrong! Besides, he DID answer... ''its protect yourself at all times and i hit him with a 1-2 and put him out...'' What the **** else does Larry Merchant want him to say? ****in...''it was a cheap shot and it was totally unfair of me to hit him like that''?... Larry knew exactly what he was doing and he knew Floyd would blow his lid.
Yeah i remember that, then all of sudden he had a bunch of yes men...the writing was on the wall with the Valuev fight...he looked poor and lack imagination for a man of his talent. With Mayweather its more to do with not fighting worthy guys consistently. He is lucky Pac has lost a step, he would be butt whupped by him in 2009. But Mayweather has stayed the same, his style far softer on the body whilst Pac is past his prime.
ANYONE would flip out like that. Its not just this interview though. Its every single one. larry merchant concentrates more on the negatives and a possible fight with pacquiao.
Tyson was 20/21, blazing through most of those guys, and took on the best in a relatively weak division. Even as he got older he still faced top opposition like Holyfield and Lewis. Because he fought regularly it was more excusable that he fought sometimes weaker opposition. Floyd, conversely, is 34 and has fought three times in what three years? One of those was a lightweight stepping up, one was a LWW stepping up, and the last one is a former LWW who'd quit in his biggest test previous and been decked twice by a very average fighter in Berto. He's already beaten the man who beaten the man who beat Berto, so what's the point? He needs to fight Pacquiao - simple as that.
Nothing wrong? So you think it's perfectly fair to quickly knock out an opponent when he's nobody's looking? Ortiz got disqualified early in his career for hitting some **** when he was down.. why is that Ortiz's fault? Shouldn't the guy just "protect himself at all times" even when falling? Floyd squaring up to an 80 year old interviewer after is quite simply pathetic regardless of whatever Merchant said, which by the way was hardly anything. Larry was right when he said after that Mayweather flipped because he knew he was gonna be asked about why he won't fight Pacquiao.
What is it with Floyd boys? He may not have done something "wrong" by the rules, but he did take advantage of Ortiz when he was trying to apologise. I have no sympathy for Victor but it was poor sportsmanship and was just as bad as what the younger man did. Floyd didn't really answer the question. He didn't have to hit when Ortiz wasn't looking, it was also clearly calculated. He would have knocked the guy out anyway, so what Merchant was asking was, why diminish what would have been a memorable victory by resorting to cheap tactics? Of course, Floyd didn't like that since he'd have to explain why he was a douche. It was easier to play the victim and say Merchant doesn't give him credit. Except that he does - he's always said Floyd is an outstanding fighter but that his attitude is rotten. Can't really disagree with him there.