I've decided.... both Waldo AND Vitlay would beat Muhammad Ali....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RAMPAGE0017, Jan 7, 2008.


  1. brownshell

    brownshell Active Member Full Member

    759
    4
    Dec 11, 2006
    Klit's are to slow and would both be dropped within 8 to ten rounds. Vlad in six. Ali loved challenges and the Klit's would bring out his best with all the white hype that would occur. Ali's speed and defense would frustrate the Klit's and they would be stopped. Be real man! What planet are you from??? The Klit's would lose to most of the best HW's of the seventies and sixties. Size would not matter.
     
  2. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,540
    13,348
    Jan 6, 2007


    As I mentioned already, Ali beats both Klits and maybe stops Wlad.

    He would not stop Vitali, however.
     
  3. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,337
    640
    Jun 16, 2006
    Your probably right --- if they fight him tomorrow.

    In 1967 --- not a chance in hell.
     
  4. PhillyShell

    PhillyShell Active Member Full Member

    704
    0
    Dec 11, 2007
    yep, i'm to blame. boy am i embarassed.
     
  5. gregor

    gregor Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,962
    3
    Dec 3, 2005
    I agree. You just forgot to add one small word to make it completely correct, so I will make it for you:
    Waldo AND Vitlay would together beat Muhammad Ali....

    Otherwise I don't see them (especially Vitali) winning with Ali. Vitali was always exhausted when he was forced to fight longer than 5 rounds. I mean 5 rounds of real fighting, not just target practice like he had against most of the bums he fought.

    So even if I can agree (just for the sake of argument) that he would be ahead on scorecard after those 5 rounds (let's say they fight in Germany), he would lose every round after that (even in Germany). And that is provided Vitali would survive the whole distance (you didn't mention if you meant 12 or 15 rounds ;-) )... but that is another story.

    And I am amongst those who think Ali is overrated. I still think Wlad would have a decent shot against Ali... but on the other hand, Wlad was KO'd by Purrity, Brewster and retired Sanders, none of them being anywhere close to Ali.
     
  6. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    18
    May 24, 2006
    Foreman was not only a great fighter in his time, but he was a good fighter in the 1990's wasnt he?:hey

    He was old and fat. Holyfield hit him at will for 12 rounds and couldnt drop him. A prime foreman would have had a very high chance of being a longterm undisputed champ in the 80s or 90s. I would pick him over Tyson, Holyfield, Wladimir. Vitaly and Lewis fights would be hard for him but winnable.
     
  7. Mindspring

    Mindspring Active Member Full Member

    673
    0
    Oct 13, 2007
    You really don't hate them, do you?
     
  8. Mindspring

    Mindspring Active Member Full Member

    673
    0
    Oct 13, 2007
    :huh Floyd Patterson?
     
  9. irmina

    irmina Member Full Member

    142
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
  10. NMUBURNER22

    NMUBURNER22 NMU Wildcats 12-0!!!!!!!! Full Member

    434
    0
    Dec 8, 2007
    Both Klits get there head boxed off....Wlad gets stopped.

    Dont ever compare these ****s to Mohammed Ali again.