Who was the greater physical phenomen in his respective prime? Tyson or Ali?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Jan 15, 2008.


  1. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,866
    2,343
    Jul 11, 2005
    Again the same problem of people combining qualities of pre-exile and post-exile Ali. Pre-exile Ali had the first 3 qualities, but lacked the other 2. Post-exile Ali lacked the first 3, but had the other 2. At no point of his career did Ali combine all 5 together.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,508
    Jan 4, 2008
    Well, I know you don't like Ali much, but that's just flat-out wrong. He danced and threw punches for 15 rounds straight against Chuvalo and Terrell while weighing 210-212 pounds and didn't look particulary worse for wear afterwards. That's stamina for you. How many fighters that size have you ever seen do that?

    He also showed his impressive physical strength as early as his first meeting with Liston in 1964, being able to control him in the clinches. And I think most would agree with me that Ali was stronger in 1967 than he was in 1964.

    You're also wrong saying that post-exile Ali wasn't fast. He never fully regained his footspeed, but in the first half of the 70's he was still extremely quick for a heavyweight. Hell, even in his second meeting with Spinks did he show impressive speed, at 36!
     
  3. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    What did post-exile Ali have that pre-exile Ali didn't ?
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,508
    Jan 4, 2008
    Good point. I was thinking along the same lines. Tyson stood up for some tremendous shots, no doubt. The difference was that Ali almost always found a way out when he was hurt, because of his ring-smartness, his recuparative power and his will-power. When Tyson got hurt he usually got knocked out soon afterwards.
     
  5. JohnBKelly

    JohnBKelly Member Full Member

    178
    4
    Oct 5, 2005
    Ali beats Tyson every day of the week. Ali had everything he could box, run or fight. He could also punch hard enough to deter all but the madmen like Frazier and Norton. Add that to one of the greatest chins of all time and its no surprise that he was known as the Greatest. 16 years of world title fights and he never once finished on his ass.

    Tyson on the other hand was fast and punched hard but there was no plan B and when he got hit he tended to stay hit. Mike was never in Muhammad's league.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,508
    Jan 4, 2008
    I agree with you. But if anyone would knock out a prime Ali it would be a prime Tyson.

    No one could do it with one punch (if that left hook Frazier gave him in the last round of a gruelling fight wasn't enough nothing would be), but maybe if Tyson caught him on the ropes with one of his devastating combinations... On the other hand, catching a prime Ali on the ropes with a combination, how would that happen?

    It's always fun to speculate, though.
     
  7. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    Realistically, Tyson might come out and surprise and trouble Ali for a few rounds with left hooks and body shots, but after 5 or 6 rounds Ali would have his number and pepper him with jabs and rights and break Tyson down and shut him out of the fight.

    Most likely, Ali would take this fight as serious as he took Liston and he'd avoid any real trouble and shut Tyson out the entire fight, bust him up bad and stop him.
     
  8. UpWithEvil

    UpWithEvil Active Member Full Member

    678
    34
    Oct 17, 2005
    Oh c'mon, this Tyson fluffing is ridiculous. Ali would have Tyson beat *mentally* before the first bell rang. Y'all are still dreaming of Tyson making Michael Spinks poop his pants with fear, you should be remembering Tyson so scared of taking another ass-whipping he bit off a man's ear to get disqualified.
     
  9. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    I remember that.
    I also remember Tyson get whipped by a fairly average jab-and-move contender called Buster Douglas.
    And Ali could do all that 10 times better !

    Still, if Ali was to take Tyson lightly I could imagine Tyson's style could score with hooks and body shots that Ali was a little prone to.

    I agree though, Ali was slap him silly, box his ears off, and stop him inside the distance. I can imagine Tyson shedding tears out of frustration as Ali peppers him mid-ring.
     
  10. werety

    werety Active Member Full Member

    815
    11
    Apr 30, 2007
    I would definitely say Ali, as mentioned above, the concept of a muhammad ali really seems hard to even think of until you see him. Tyson on the other hand is much more easy to conceptualize. What I think makes Ali most interesting is that with his unbeleivable footspeed, handspeed, and reflexes, he had a huge amount of physical strength. Most fighters of his type aren't known for their physical strength like Leonard, Robinson, Jones, etc.
     
  11. rekcutnevets

    rekcutnevets Black Sash Full Member

    13,685
    343
    May 25, 2007
    It's a toss up really. It was only during Ali's fight with Cooper that he had to call on his will to win. Ali's will to win only became evident in the 70's. He had too many gifts for fighters he faced in the 60's.

    I take that back, I never saw the Doug Jones fight. He may have needed his will to win that disputed decision.

    Mike Tyson normally lost because he never showed a great will to win. Even when he was fighting a bad fight, his athletic ability normally pulled it out for him. He was not looking particularly well against Botha, but that sledge hammer straight had no problem sealing the deal.
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,551
    41,685
    Apr 27, 2005
    Have you ever thought that maybe, just maybe, pre exile Ali didn't need nor have the right opportunity thru neccessity to show the strength? Post exile Ali was pretty much the same size and he sure hadn't been doing any strength training to gain this sudden magical strength. You are also wrong on the stamina front, pre exile Ali had excellent stamina and any sensible comparison will realise dancing and moving loads more as opposed to flat footed will sap more energy. As if Ali is suddenly going to acquire significantly more stamina when older and starting to decline.

    I'll grant you speed and reflex but the rest was BS.
     
  13. birddog

    birddog Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    1
    Dec 1, 2005
    I agree also, ALi would have done a job on Tyson before the fight (let alone in the fight). Ali feared no one , and any Tyson fan would have to admit Mike was vulnerable mentally. ALi never backed down even when he may have been on the short end of a fight, he had character up the kazoo, (whatever a kazoo is)

    realized i didn't answer the original question, ALi
     
  14. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Tyson was quicker and had more explosive power and natural reflexes, superior timing also.

    Tyson.
     
  15. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,866
    2,343
    Jul 11, 2005
    Stamina is something more than just moving around and throwing punches for 15 rounds. It's about durability also, to stand under a lot of pressure, which shows the stamina. To draw an analogy with running, it's not that hard to run several miles with minimal training, but try running just 1 mile of cross-country running, that's completely different.
    Controlling Liston in the clinches? What you saying, you calling that holding that Ali always used an example of strength? Try something else, it doesn't require much strength to clinch.

    Extremely quick post-exile Ali? For a few seconds per fight, maybe yes, he woke up and threw those pitty-pat flurries, some people are so impressed with. When you don't care about accuracy at all, some other heavyweights could do that in training with speed-bag, didn't look any slower than Ali.