Sky Commentary trying to brainwash me

Tired flag-waving of the worst kind. I watched while playing pool in the boozer. Some of the arguments in the pub were more exciting. Khan would embarrass Brook. The Pole looked about 50 and barely threw a worthwhile punch. Matthew Hatton would give him a better fight. Brook may be world class. But nothing we have seen so far supports the argument. He has to beat a live opponent to convince me. As for Sky boxing coverage ..... don;t start me. At times, it looks like a trainspotters convention. If a fight is crap, for god's sake say so. Jim Watt gets stick on here, but at least he calls it as it is.

 

I am not talking about the world, I am talking about Sky Sports producer.

 

They are so desperate to hype Brook as a PPV star, it is embarrassing the amount of hyperbole that was spewed by the commentary team last night. It is no fault of Brook's I thought he looked very well last night, it was a soft stoppage but Brook was going to spark him.

 

As carrot cruncher says above- Jim Watt is the only pundit on that channel that doesn't dance to his paymaster's tune and tell you a fight is good or someone is performing when they are shite- why he gets as much stick I'll never know.

McGuigan and co are the biggest yes men about.

 

Sky are desperate for another R.Hatton because a fighter with that kind of appeal equals nothing but money, so i think alot of it is trying to get as many people as poss on board