4 some1 who is around this board 4 so long , and so frequently , u have great ignorance and lack of knowledge .
I think that you've got some of your words jumbled up,Frankie ! What you probably intended to refer to, was my great KNOWLEDGE and my lack of IGNORANCE ! I humbly apologise for my opinion not conforming to your revisionist blueprint,but we all have different slants on things. I don't have problems with YOUR opinion,I just disagree with it. I can't help feeling though,that your obvious dislike of Muhammad Ali blinds you to his accomplishments as a boxer. Many fighters,before and after Ali,have had controversial and lucky moments in the ring,but you tend to single out one man. We have every right to like or dislike a boxer,but should learn to give credit where credit's due. For example,as a person,I've found Mike Tyson to be a wanker incarnate over the years,but it does n't prevent me from rating him around eighth on my all time heavyweight list.
No , I stand corrected . And this is d proof : Not that I expect u 2 understand y it is a proof , and what I meant previously . Not at all . U probably skipped many of my posts and as usual failed 2 understand d rest .
Frankly u didn't understand mine . Like most don't . But as I already explained 2 some1 else in order 4 my posts 2 make sense 2 some1 , that 1 should have sense in 1st place . And that was y it is a bad debate .
And think the Ali of 1974 wasn't the best Ali. The 1964-67 version of Ali would have absolutely destroyed Foreman. Ali never fought the same after his layoff. Ali would have always found a way to outsmart Foreman.
Ali did outsmart and out-tough Foreman in Zaire but I'd rather see them fight a few times before I decide one fighter has another's number. It was hardly an easy fight. Foreman was landing some heavy shots and I thought it was pretty even prior to the KO. He was also desperate for a rematch but Ali never seemed very interested.