David Haye: "About the same size as George Foreman"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Oct 12, 2011.


  1. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    to get 210
     
  2. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    Hayes average weight as a heavyweight is 215.6 (for his 6 fights that he counts)
     
  3. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,024
    Mar 6, 2011
    :patsch


    I really don't get why so many people here are trying to basically argue that a circle is a square. Judging heavyweight boxers weight is very simple to do since they actually record it just prior to the fight, it's not speculation like height. It seems to me that we're witnessing extreme little man syndrome where certain posters seem to have the hump that a man they called " small, dwarf, overblown cruiser, tiny " is actually the same size as their 'giant' heroes from the past. Unbelievable.
     
  4. PowerHoock

    PowerHoock Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,084
    3
    Jan 18, 2011
    This content is protected


    Haye is a big man himself. 6'3 isnt small. the're just small compared to the K2s
     
  5. mr fists

    mr fists Active Member Full Member

    939
    0
    Sep 17, 2010
    while foreman is a naturally bigger man than haye, it's not by much. heavyweights are just a lot bigger these days.
     
  6. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    :deal
     
  7. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    ANd he has a higher kidney output and lower liver enzymes. :lol:
     
  8. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,564
    3
    Sep 14, 2010
    :lol::lol:
     
  9. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    I didn't say a word about Vitali!? I just said 5 or even 10 pounds are of rather little effect on a 255 lbs boxer.
     
  10. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,924
    Jan 18, 2010
    Big George was much stronger and "rougher" build as Haye.
    A totally different body type, wich is made for raw power and more limited agility.

    Completely uncomparable and I would favour Haye in a million years in a fight (any kind) between them.
     
  11. lefty

    lefty Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,802
    2
    Apr 29, 2006
    You still get trainers of top fighters believing dumb **** like that, not long ago this sort of thing was the norm...
    You're making yourself sound dumb by not believing it, either that or very young.
     
  12. lefty

    lefty Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,802
    2
    Apr 29, 2006
    See ******s still exist...
     
  13. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    That's true. Foreman wouldn't look anywhere as 'big' today as he looked compared to his 70s competitors.
     
  14. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Haye moved to Cw because he couldnt make 200 anymore. Which means he was a 200+ cutting to Cw.

    Haye was probably cutting 10-20 pounds so he is a natural 215er*

    So he is the same height as Foreman but not as thick. However, people are making a huge deal about the difference. It is not that huge. Remember, Haye can hit hard as hell too.

    Face it, Big George would not look so big against the likes of a Vitali Klitchko

    With a 5-6 inch height advantage, an iron chin, and an outboxer style. Vitali would be a nightmare H2H against Foreman. Barring a freak injury ofcourse.
     
  15. Vern

    Vern Guest

    Some of the statements made in this thread are laughable. Face it, Foreman would look small next to Audley Harrison. Foreman is not Valuev.

    Ps. Thus far 62% of the voters on this thread are utterly ******ed.