you silly ****, are you not the poster who said khans resume was better than mayweathers from 135 and below, now you think linares is better than khan, balance footwork and reflexes lmfao, his footwork sure was great wasnt it, circling constantly to the left and not being able to avoid trouble is not great footwork seriously you need to stick to making threads about khan and posting semi naked pics of him dont get involved in discussions where you expose yourself as not having a ****ing clue.......you dont know **** about BAXING
Highlighted part: That was Darni. Underlined part: That wasn't the problem you ****ing mong, you've never known anything about intangibles before so don't start trying to act like you do know. ''Circling constantly to the left''.atsch:verysad Italics: I was going to ask were you speaking from experience, but then you just tried to do it. Are you giving an example of why not to try to start talking about boxing? You're a miserable ******* and have never offered anything here, **** off.
Jesus Christ a lot of rude ****s on here! Some people know more than others about the sport - no need to jump down someones throat about it is there? Remember, boxing snobs - Once upon a time you knew **** all too We all arent enemies, just folks with differences
Linares is fairly talented but his defence is pretty poor and he is too vunerable. Cracking fight though, credit to both men.
it was part of the problem numb nuts, he was predictable in his movement and demarco knew exactly where he was going to be and never had to cut the ring off all he had to do was follow linares around as 95% of the time he was circling to the left if laz needs to know he is talking **** then its my duty to let him know :rasta
i understand what your saying and well said but i have a problem with laz (not afraid to admit it), he kicked off there 2 weeks ago, called me out :nut on here yes he called me out while calling ME a keyboard warrior, then he went and reported me to mods and got me banned for a week so **** him he made his bed with me let him lie in it had it of been anyone else i wouldnt of entered the thread, problem was his fascination with linares is more than likely coming from the fact that his trainer is linked to a trainer for another boxer laz tends to side with :roll:
i agree,i don't wanna,not a big fan of laz(cockhead) but just because he forgot rocky thingiemebobs name don't mean he don't know owt,well actually in laz's case it dus but come on,ive been watching boxing for 30 odd years,and have forgot more than people like laz will ever know,just because some of you lot read books or watch vids of fights from yesteryear,don't mean you are more knowledgeable about the skill set of certain boxers:thumbsup although laz is way off with linares,he is and always has been easy to hit,now thats not the sigh of a slick boxer. i also agree with wallet about moving too the left alot,thats when he was getting caught a ****ing hell of a lot :hey bloody boxing snobbery,thought id never see it:rofl:rofl
We all have one people. Mandanda and the picture guy, people who don't like arrogance and TFFP, etc. No. You're overrating DeMarco's ability to read what his opponent is doing to a monumental extent. I think you'll find when you go back and watch the fight was that it turned in DeMarco's favour when Linares stopped circling to the left and stood straight in front of him and traded. That 95% of the time in which he circled was the 95% of the fight where he was dominating the fight with ease, he then stood his ground, had his nose broken and his face cut to ribbons, before getting continually caught and stopped. His footwork isn't very good, but you don't even know why it wasn't any good. His problem was circling to wide, not circling in a certain direction. If you circle too wide you fatigue yourself over the course of the fight, think Acosta against Rios. He was tiring himself because of how wide he circled, and then had his nose broken because he stood in front of his man, meaning he had nothing left, which resulted in him getting stopped. If you're going to correct somebody about ''talking ****'', at least make sure you're not doing the exact same thing. ''All he had to do was follow him'', that's what he WAS doing for the duration.