PED's,what is it really?

To what drug specifically are you saying he should look into? Methandrostenelone, testosterone propionate, cypionate, enanthate, suspension, insulin, HGH, anadrol 50, deca-durabolin, undecoanate, stanozolol, anavar...or how about the late 90's, early 2000's andro products, are we talking about 'legal supplements like creatine, NOS, HMB, really old school stuff like boron and smilax (lol)...

I think theres a lot of hype over these drugs based on mis-information and the media. Food if consumed in specific amounts at specific times acts the same as a drug in that it causes a metabolic change in the body. If fod then increases performance, and by definition, food is a drug, should we also classify food as a PED?

 

And you got mad at Floyd fans for saying Pac was on PEDs?

****ing joke you've truly become. An absolute joke.

 

http://www.pharmacytechs.net/blog/top-10-performance-enhancing-drugs

A nice article showcasing ten performance enhancing drugs with a description of its action, its medical use and athletic advantage. Also along with the drug are examples of athletes who took the drug. Interesting read for a practical look at these so-called "PEDs".

 

how can pac get an advantage by using PEDS within 7 days cutoff and not be positive if tested right after the fight? is there such peds that can make you superhuman within 7 days?

 

PEDs are Performance Enhancing Drugs which means they don't have to all be illegal. In a legal sense, caffeine is a PED.

 

Won't increase the durability of a chin per say, however, when one gets hurt in the ring, it fatigues you... which will hinder punch output, movement, epo, through increased oxygen to the cells, can improve stamina and recovery during training and during the event itself. HGH will can increase strength, recovery, speed, but won't put on as much noticeable muscle as anabolics.

Anabolics, which I'm not thinking floyd or pac are taking, because lets say they were taking the clear, a trenbolone like compound, cycling off between events would have put on significant mass and muscle... as in walking around with 8 to 12 pounds heavier, all muscle. They are public figures and that would've been very noticeable.

HGH or EPO, that I don't know. Since they are basically undetectable.

 

Compare 1998
http://espn.go.com/mlb/history/leaders/_/breakdown/season/year/1998/sort/homeRuns
to 2010
http://espn.go.com/mlb/history/leaders/_/breakdown/season/year/2010/sort/homeRuns

 

did you hear that they wound up the baseball tighter back then to increase homeruns?

 

and when did they stop doing that?

 

don't know, they should again compare baseball back then to now if one bounced higher than the other.

...and those DR players are corking their bats back then that's why numbers on those years were up.

 

PEDs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance-enhancing_drugs

 

i agree, the hypocisy is laughable...

mebbe some of the *******s are mentally prepping themselves for a possible defeat and looking for an avenue for that reason....

kinda reminds me of *****s w/ Pacquiao...

 

confidence, definitely