American Elite Level

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by WHU, Jan 22, 2008.


  1. WHU

    WHU Member Full Member

    464
    0
    Jun 18, 2006
    Due to the overwhelming arrogance of a number of americans on this forum with regards to those fighters who happen not to be american which prevents them from reaching the "elite" american level, I was wondering how nationality makes such a big deal about the ability of a fighter. Does a non american fighter have to beat an american fighter to prove they have abilty and deserved to be classed as elite. Or is it that they have to fight on American turf to prove they are elite? Also those of you who think of American boxers to be someway elite why is this? Do American fighters get trained any differently, is the pool of talent deeper in America (i really dont think this is the case). Hopkins and Calzaghe seems to be the biggest debate at the moment. Funny thing is i think both fighters records are similar lots of victories against fighters who are not number household names. However both hav beat big names towards back ends of their career, De La Hoya Trinidad Winky, Lacy, Kessler. It amazes me how people disregard all of these fighters becasue they hav all bein raved about on here in the past. Personally i am split over who i think will win the fight and we will just have to wait and see how the styles gel and the tatcis employed by each fighter. To end my rant i just dont see how nationality can make a difference in how you perceive a fighter. A great fighter can come from any country in the world is my firm opinion please expand on my points n ideas put across in this rant/post.
     
  2. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    Americans see their country as the greatest place on Earth. It's why a very small number of their population have passports. Compare this to the rest of the world and it is easy to understand that America, as a nation, is very insular. I believe that this spills over into most walks of life, boxing being just one example. People can come from the outside to fight in America and that seems to be ok. But boxers who fight outside of the US do not get that much exposure on the TV networks. Don't forget that Americans are pretty much the fattest nation on Earth also so sit in front of the TV a lot with twinkies, hot dogs, potato chips & cola then got out for some food after the boxing. American TV is rarely interested in people like Calzaghe because he has refused to fight in the USA until now. Hell, the only reason he is known is because he badly beat up one of the 10% of the population with a passport: Jeff Lacy. To add insult to injury, this was on American TV.

    I believe this is a debate that has a number of key points, but those outlined above, are some of the major ones when it comes to Americans.
     
  3. WHU

    WHU Member Full Member

    464
    0
    Jun 18, 2006
    I think that provides a very good viewpoint of some of American Society however i belive it would be unfair to tarnish all Americans with the same stereotypes as im sure there are many Americans with a more global view of boxing. I think it would be fair to say the average American would be excused from this opinon, however I think those posting on here are actually boxing fans. My view of a boxing fan is someone who has a sound knowledge of the technical aspects of boxing as well as the philisophical aspects along with having knowledge of boxing history. From watching many bouts there have being many fighters of different nationalities who im my humble opinions were great. Whilst watching these fights however i have wondered is there a coincidence that many great fighters especially decades ago are American or from the region around. My theory is perhaps Americans and countrys in close proximity were able to get into the spotlight namely the eye of the American publci which has in turn lead them to greatness. I am not playing down the greatness of these fighters i am just wondering would others from different nations have proved thmeselves great given the opportunity to enter the spotlight. Perhaps Eastern Europeans would have always dominated the heavyweight divison given the opportunitys in decades before that they now possess. Just my thoughs guys feel free to agree disagree add your own viewpoints etc
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,894
    3,275
    Jun 30, 2005
    Real boxing fans know the deal.

    Carlos Monzon rarely ever fought in the States and he's a legend.

    The same goes for Eder Jofre.
     
  5. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,090
    Jul 19, 2004
    20 years ago american boxing was in a very healthy state.

    if an elite fighter fell off another one quickly replaced him.

    heavyweights dominated the american scene for a 100 years as well.

    currently in a mini slump but still with some talented boxers, biggest problem i see is the strength in depth.

    american seond tier used to be very very good with strength in every division feather to heavy .

    america now really does not have a second tier.

    it has an elite
    a 1st tier and then journeymen, with very very little coming through.

    that is why the rest of the world has caught up and in some divisions surpassed.

    american tv needs restructering otherwise in as little as 3 to 4 years when the current crop
    holyfield/toney/mosely/dlh/jones/mayweather/hopkins/wright/
    will definatly be retired what and who is going to fill the gap.
     
  6. coronacards

    coronacards Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,695
    0
    Apr 24, 2006
    I am American, and many of my FAVORITE fighters have NOT been American.

    It's a matter of this: Europe doesn't have greater athletes than the USA, but to PROVE yourself at soccer, you go to Europe. You play in the Premier League, not the MLS.

    If you want to prove yourself at Golf, you go to the PGA Tour. If you want to prove yourself at tennis, you play the major tournaments. If you want to prove yourself in baseball, the USA is the place to be. If you want to prove yourself at basketball, it's the NBA.

    Here's the point: Most of the big fights nowadays are fought in the USA, and they have been for a long time. Madison Square Garden, Atlantic City, and Las Vegas have hosted many of the biggest fights of all-time. To gain the exposure, the USA is the Mecca of fighting. I think everyone would agree with that. You can't name any European arenas that have held bigger fights than places in Atlantic City, MSG, or Las Vegas. That's the point, and that's unbiased.

    In the meantime, when you look at Calzaghe's record between the Eubank and Lacy fight, who's on there? NOBODY. Those were 9 of his prime years that he spent toying around with bums and defending a garbage WBO Super Middleweight title. He didn't seek out the biggest fights, the biggest names, or the most competitive divisions. That's my gripe with JC. I have nothing against him or his boxing ability. I think he made an effort to pad his record, rack up his title defenses, and hang out on his home turf (or close to it) to make money. That's fine with me, but let's not call him something he's not.

    Hopkins jumped 2 divisions to beat Tarver. Hopkins beat Trinidad when he was the underdog. With all that, Hopkins still made his 20 Middleweight title defenses.

    RJJ won titles from 160-Heavyweight, enough said!

    JC's resume just doesn't stack up. It's not me backing Americans. Morales and Barrera went after the BIGGEST challenges they could find. Calzaghe did not.
     
  7. Psiegert611

    Psiegert611 New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Jan 17, 2008
    The United States is better than any other country in the world. There is no arguement. Only 10% of Americans have passports because we don't need to leave the country. We have it all right here. People from other countries need passports because they want to come to the United States.
     
  8. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    It's time for all of us Americans, especially boxers, realize that it's a big world we live in. I do not have the statistics but it seems other than the big name fighters like PBH, DLH, etc., boxing is at best a second tier sport in the US. Europe & Russia seem to be on a big upswing and more and more championships are being won by men from there. It should be in the interest of big name US fighters to get overseas more often to prove their abilities against those who are, in increasing numbers, some the best fighters in the world. Likewise, I would like to see more international fights on US soil.
     
  9. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    Interesting points, I personally believe that socioeconomic factors play a huge part in where the best boxers originate from. A lot of boxers have used boxing as a way to make a living and when easier options become available we can't blame the general public for picking those. In America it might be a worthy argument to suggest that a lot of potential boxing talent now ends up in other sports. On the other hand, following the disintigration of the Soviet Union, poverty proliferated and boxing may now seem a viable route of escape. There are more factors obviously, for instance, genetic predisposition for certain heights and weights would obviously change the size of the talent pools for given weights for each nation based on the ratios of different races present.
     
  10. WHU

    WHU Member Full Member

    464
    0
    Jun 18, 2006
    America is alot closer to Mexico than it is Wales. You make many good points especially with regards to American being the Mecca for boxing i agree. Also as you used football/soccer as an example, i agree with the Premier League being the Mecca however there are lots of players who are regarded great who dont play in the Premier League, Kaka, Ronaldinho to name a few. I expect some one will say the play in a top league La liga, Serie A. However wouldnt most ppl agree Britain is the league below America in terms of boxing? Also i dont think Calzaghe can be blamed for his record maybe Frank Warren. Why is it people dont dig American fighters records? To add another element to the argument do non AMerican fighters not have to pad their record out suffieciently before they have a chance to fight in America. Isnt it the American public who are obsessed wid the 0 in the losses column!!! I personally think losses means nothing look at the UFC Wanderlei Silva loses Chuck Lidell loses as does GSP they are stil great MMA fighters. This is perhaps another argument but i think alot of these crticims of Calzaghe are coming from the American public who are also the ones who demand a perfect record. What do these people want good fights or good record. Who would buy a fight wen one fighters record is 23-21. I wonder.To conclude fighters need to pad their records before they get the chance to take part in the big fights.
     
  11. Ally Boy

    Ally Boy Future Addict Full Member

    80
    0
    Jan 18, 2005
    I have been to the States a few times and I have to say, I have yet to meet an American that I didn't like.

    I found them to be very amiable and good to talk to.

    Yes, they are a little insular, but with a country that size, with every amenity known to man, it is quite understandable.

    Some people on here say things purely for effect, some probably are really arrogant and ignorant, but thats the beauty of a forum, its a free for all and it wouldn't work without idiots, nuthuggers, fan boys, insular people, ethnocentrics, haters and so on and so forth.

    With regards to boxing, americans are now turning to other sports as there are bigger pay days (NBA, NFL, Baseball). Boxing isn't as glamourous as it once was and has fallen way down the pecking order, the golden days of this sport (world wide) are dwindling because of politics, people getting screwed over, pay per view and the generwal lack of decent coverage in the media.

    Boxing shot itself in the foot a long time ago but has yet to do anything about the wounds
     
  12. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    The reasons for the US dominating the heavyweight division are simple, the Mob refused to allow the belt to leave the country, hence all the fights taking place in the US and other belts being formed such as the WBO. Look at the 'eastern Euros' today, they are dominating, do you really believe they just got good over night? Or was it they couldnt fight as they didnt have the oppertunity because of one reason or another? Anyway....mecca of boxing? Like I said in the past 'yes' because the mob had monolpoly on the belt/s, today? no! When was the last time you ssaw an american boxer draw 50,000+ or take 20,000+ overseas, when Calzaghe has finished with Hopkins, Jones sais he will fight in Wales, if this happens ill be suprised if he brings 1000 with him.
     
  13. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    It is simply EXPOSURE for us American's. We don't care where you come from, we just want to see what you've got. Calzaghe's fights have not been available for us to see how great he is until now. I too blame all this on Frank Warren, because you can't even find fights of Joe on YouTube.
     
  14. WHU

    WHU Member Full Member

    464
    0
    Jun 18, 2006
    I agree its human nature find the easiest way to improve your economic condition and standard of living. I think there is talent in all social classes however opportunities vary. Look at BJ Penn of the UFC and Barrera neither need to fight they chose to fight. However on the whole the only way less economically advatageous members of society must escape their situation through sport rather than education or inherited wealth etc. I belive that theres no coincidence with regards to the number of fighters coming out of New York, the amount of boxing gyms being present same with Mexico and CUba on the amateur circuit, same with Brazil and football. If u had to travel 30mins in the car to play baseball or could travel 5mins by foot to a boxing gym what would the majority chose. If an athelte could get paid to be a pro boxer or a pro footballer what would they choose.Its human nature chose the option which is easiest and offers most risk to your health whilst giving you economic benefits. Yes very interesting points raised with reagrds to the break up with the Soviet Union i must admit i have little knowledge on the opportunities presented to society prior to the break up im guessing that athletes were taking to training camps and forced to stay amateur similar situation to Cuba? I dont know pleae inform me
     
  15. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    To begin with, the Soviets wouldn't permit their fighters to compete on a pro level with US fighters. Finally, they are allowed to compete and have prospered. What creates elite fighters from a national perspective is dire poverty, desperation and a very large pool of prospective talent, meaning a huge population. That's why America dominated boxing in the past and why former Soviet countries are now dominating the heavyweight division. It should also be noted that much fewer American athletes are going into boxing. Pro basketball and football are a lot more lucrative and less dangerous.