My thoughts on Bute vs Johnson and Super Six Final:

Bute not only has fast hands and a variety of way to hurt his opponent. He showed he can carry out a tactical fight, and win easy if necessary. While Bute can be hit in transition between punches by a good counter guy, I tend to think he's the best at 168

 

I see some people still havent learnt, Froch would beat Bute but a very close one to Ward.
Bute would get tagged by Froch no doubt about that and i think he would go in the later rounds when Froch puts it on Bute...
Who the **** has Bute won against, really i think fan boys need to smell the coffee i think someone like Dirrel, Kessler, Ward, Froch will make him look quite ordinary its easy to look good against shot fighters or tomato cans.. :yep

 

same shot fighter that made froch look bad 4 months ago?maybe you should put youre thoughts on paper and read them loud a couple of times before posting them on internet.they doesn't make sense and you look like a ****.

 

:deal

atsch

Newsflash Reevo:
Froch: 114-114 / 112-116 / 111-117
Bute: 109-119 / 108-120 / 108-120

 

LOL, you Brits drink far too much Pissy beer.
I remember when you ranked Hatton over Mayweather. :yep

You rank Bute over Ward for his fight with Andrade and the Road Warrior. You BoxingRec Newbies are hilarious!!:rofl:rofl

 

Did he make Froch look bad i had froch winning by 6 rounds, one ref was a **** in that and had it by a draw...
But the point im making is that if Bute had a fight with any of the fighters i mentioned your not going to see Bute dominating them like in the fight last night. so dont be ****ing ****.
If Bute is so good why didnt he enter the super six, o if forgot he cant fight out of Canada.

 

lol.... i want to clarify 5 points here

1) Im not a brit... i live in alaska
2) Im not sure i had even joined ESB yet, let alone believe Hatton outranked Mayweather or would beat him. Mayweather has been one of my fav fighters "in" the ring...
3) Theres many values that play in the reason why i rate Bute over Ward, besides staring at BoxRec. It does serve as a good reference point, statistically, wouldnt you say? I will rate Ward over Bute IF he gets a win over Froch... does that unbunch your frontal wedgie?
4) I do believe that Bute would edge out Ward in a fight (oh yeah.... did i mention im an american [alaska is part of the US], so you're "im a brit so i automatically hate Ward" theory falls a bit short....).
5) Did i ever tell you i was a Ward fan first, before Bute?

okays.... now thats out of the way.....

how about..... sit the **** down and insert foot in ****ing mouth?

 

Sorry, there used to be a Brit body builder posting here using the same nich.
Still, you are delusional to compare Ward's accomplishments with those of Bute.

 

common sense tells me the only one who is delusional here is the one who assumed a bunch of **** about me, believed i was someone else, and got stupidly exposed on ESB...

 

Ward have the best win with Kessler but Bute resume is deeper

 

You call that an exposure. I call it desperation on ur part.
Regardless if I mistook you for someone else who happens to have the same weird nich, it doesn't excuse your sad understanding about the sport of boxing.
Now run tell that!

 

What a surprise, you still are in a thread talking about a fighter you hate.

And please, this time give actual arguments rather than duck the posts that expose you.

For example, please explain how Ward's accomplishments are so much better than Bute's so that they can't even be compared.