[VIDEO] PROOF that Pacquiao is taking STEROIDS for Marquez fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by s.sarwar7, Nov 7, 2011.


  1. s.sarwar7

    s.sarwar7 Active Member Full Member

    1,330
    0
    Mar 23, 2011
    http://youtu.be/cD21ZbWEyPw

    Honestly never fully believed this **** before, skip to 5 mins in to see what I'm talking about.

    Basically Ariza has made it so obvious, instead of being curious about the allegations on the Marquez camp he and the Pacquiao camp are 'sure' nothing dodgy is going on. The Marquez camp are happy to do urine and blood testing whenever to prove their innocence... but the Pacquiao camp say that they are happy with the Commisions rules on testing. :rofl

    Okay you *******s if this was any other fighter this would not be the typical responce, something dodgy is going on. How the **** can you know another fighter is clean? And you're not a little suspicious?! :patsch

    If Marquez is tested so will Pacquiao that's why they are playing down the allegations even though they are not directed at themselves.

    Face it no matter how much of a dick Floyd is he isn't talking trash with "If you're the best; take the test"

    We all know that certain substances will not appear without random blood testing. Even a complete n00b will now be able to see through the bull**** :hi:
     
  2. sailor pops

    sailor pops miam! vice Full Member

    1,052
    0
    Apr 21, 2011
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S96DVTtvXqY&feature=related[/ame]
     
  3. SouthChicagoRay

    SouthChicagoRay Active Member Full Member

    691
    12
    Dec 17, 2010
    are you talking about when Ariza says "any of those outside things are going to effect either one of them"
     
  4. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,635
    18,358
    Oct 7, 2006
    "If you're the best, take the mother****ing test".

    I like it!
     
  5. TonyD407

    TonyD407 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,333
    7
    Dec 6, 2008
    No **** Sherlock !!!!!
     
  6. ceebz

    ceebz Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,462
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    Yeah, man, this proves it!
     
  7. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    You and I have a difference of opinion with the term "proof".
     
  8. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    Pac said he'll take the tests.. STFU and go away..
     
  9. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007
    People are very hooked on proofs around here, yet present nothing of the sort.
     
  10. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    they know the nsac tests r bs. if they do a test beforehand they let u know when they r goinna do it
     
  11. iRuBerPosteR

    iRuBerPosteR Guest

    didnt ellerbe on record acknowledged that team pac already agreed to usada test?
     
  12. stormy

    stormy Live and Learn Full Member

    3,912
    133
    Mar 17, 2009
    all it "proves" is that They will fight Marquez without having to test for anything outside of the usual state testing protocols.

    Marquez will still be gone in a few rounds or so, and it seems Team Pac are not thinking of using double standards when it comes to taking a fight with a potentially dangerous opponent people are saying is doping right now. :deal
     
  13. Gunns4hire

    Gunns4hire Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,439
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    If ariza said for marquez to submit to random test...it would've completely contradicted their stance on testing in regards to fighting Floyd.....so basically if ur fighting PAC u have a free out to take any steroid u can that doesn't show up in urine...cuz they have backed themselves into a wall in regards to asking for additional testing....

    It isn't proof that they are using steroids but rather proof that they can't make it an issue ever for their opponents
     
  14. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    It's not proof of anything but it's kinda fishy
     
  15. killjoy408

    killjoy408 Active Member Full Member

    1,402
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    it seems like the OP doesn't know the definition of proof.