Like I said, two of those 10 rounds were close enough rounds to score even, but what do you do when its Marqeuz who closes a close round with a hard accurate combination.:think
Oh he took advantage of Pac. Again and again. This is the new internet boxing culture myth of why Pacquiao deserves to have gotten the nod. Hot off the presses. This is what they'll use from here on out. :deal
In my book, Marquez won a very close, but clear decision in the second fight. In this third bout, I thought he won decisively. He was the guy in control the majority of the fight. Even in most of the exchanges, he was the one landing the crisp, well-placed blows.
You're still wearing your eyeglasses with MARQUEZ balls in it. A really unreliable source of information. CHUPA LE OTRA VEZ! :hat
They probably gave the close rounds to JMM pretty much the same way Merchant and other *******s gave Pac all the close rounds.
10-2 is too wide divac. so basically you scored all the three fight 10-2. with pac winning only 6 rounds?
I've not heard one poster say they scored 10 rounds in Pacquiao's favour. It's non-comparable. I can't fathom how anyone could have scored this fight that wide. The idea was for me to come in this thread and say something along the lines of, "Hey Divac, JMM is the man. He's a lot better than I ever gave him credit for". I stand by all of that, but I was so taken back by his scorecard that I lost track. Anyway... Hey Divac, JMM is the man. He's a lot better than I ever gave him credit for.