1. the fight was CLOSER then most people think 2. alot of people i know had pac winning, and there not "blind *******s" 3. it TRULY could of went either way.... 4. EVERYONE SCORES A FIGHT DIFFERENTLY
I'm being ultra real: 1. JMM clearly won 2. Your friends clearly don't know **** about boxing 3. Yeah some people score on **** like who had the skankiest goatee etc
it wasn't close enough not to be a clear victory was it? I mean the fight had moments where it looked like a schooling from Marquez. I'll rewatch the fight cause it's always easier to score a fight when the dust has settled for me. Maybe it wasn't crystal clear but i saw it easily for JMM
Try scoring the fight on mute so that you don't hear the commentators bias. Also, use your own judgement, don't look at Lederman's card. Doing this you will probably have Marquez up or at least a draw.
You should usually wait a few days for everybody to calm down. And there is more logical people in the lounge.
Pac-Marquez 3 10-10 9-10 10-9 10-9 9-10 9-10 9-10 10-9 10-9 9-10 9-10 9-10 113-116 MARQUEZ Christmas came early for Pacquaio, Arum dressed as Santa.
For some reason people score on coming forward and missing punches while getting your head used as a speed ball
Not clearly winning and losing are two completely different things. I can squint my eyes and see an argument for a draw. But Pac winning is some bull**** straight up.
The trilogy should be 2W-1D in Favor of JMM. (I was going to say 3 W's but that would make me sound like I am showing favoritism) Manny Know's most important. Anyone have any comments by Roach?