Was the fight actually entertaining despite the controversy?

it wasn't a war but was very entertaining

 

I liked it, both guys showed some great attributes, Marquez in particular. There was some nice controlled bursts of aggression throughout. Marquez has an ATG uppercut.

 

The casual fan I watched it with was ****ing loving it.

 

He must have been a smart-casual fan :smoke

 

ziiiiiiiiiing

 

By far the worst of the three fights for me..Boring to watch two fighters just waiting for the other :?

 

My bro who watched it with me thought it was a good fight too, and he has nothing more than a passing interest in the sport.

He had Pac winning clearly though, so I've basically disowned him now :twisted:

 

It wasn't a war but I like tactical matches so imo it was good and entertaining match.

 

It was practically a shut out. Pac landed a left or a right every once in a while, but CLEARLY Marquez won.

 

i really like the fight. JMM is 38 damn it & shows a heart of champ.

 

Then boxing is clearly not for you.

 

Even better than Hopkins, he was fighting someone 10 times much better than Pavlik.

 

completely agree with you this is boxing it was an intelligent fight by marquez, it was really intense and everybody at the bar i was watching it were glued to the tv

 

Yes.

'Twas awesome to see that overrated Pacquiao getting his ass exposed for the world to see yet again. Too bad he got a gift.

 

i thought it was a good fight. it had me up all nite watching the replay. it was a tactical chess match. and jmm definitely got the best of him