How do you rank Marquez/PAC robbery with other fights historically?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Popshots, Nov 13, 2011.


  1. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,048
    1,096
    Aug 6, 2005
    Those fights in the grand scale were meaningless compared to this fight.

    Also, I had Judah beating Matthysee.
     
  2. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    :deal And lol at those who say the fight was close. It was only close b/c you are ******ed and bias. Marquez was sweeping rounds and even me myself while cheering him on, did not think he would be able to keep it up. But he did. Pac had one or two real big pushes to change the course of the fight but he came up short and tried to go for desperate hail marys that missed. JMM was just simply outboxing him. Pac NEVER took control of the fight let alone consecutive rounds. Marquez had all the momentum and never had to change his gameplan b/c his plan A was working. This was a ****ing highway robbery for the history of the sport. It will hurt Pac more than if he actually lost a close fight and was humble afterwards. Now he looks like a delusional irrational bad guy. You cant feel sorry for Marquez but people could feel his pain and frustration. Now. It's time for Floyd to step up to the plate and finish the job Marquez started. Pac will more than likely retire or fight the Margarito/Cotto winner.
     
  3. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    it was de la hoya - trinidad all over again
     
  4. Sayers

    Sayers Member Full Member

    156
    1
    Dec 28, 2009
    Punch stats are ridiculous and last night proves it. Two solid shots to the face in a combination is worth much more than five glancing blows off the top off the head. I actually won money on it betting on Pac on points but I would almost prefer the correct result for the good of the sport. We are probably going to see a rematch anyway, it would have been much more interesting at the correct 1-1-1 than at 2-1-0.
     
  5. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    The punch stats will be exposed as a lie soon enough. People will just watch the fight and count the "landed" punches. Keyword is landed. Unless they gave Pac 2 for 1s there is no ****ing way he landed that many punches or at that high of a percentage. It just did not ****ing happen. Marquez made him miss more than ANY other previous fight between the two. Pac threw far less punches and did not even get off his combos that he always does. JMM took it away. Pac landed an odd power shot every now and again. JMM was landing combos regularly.
     
  6. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,048
    1,096
    Aug 6, 2005
    Toopretty, agree or disagree:

    The argument for 11-1 or 10-2 JMM is easier to make than Pac winning?

    I agree.