For those who thought Marquez won: Incompetent judges or...?

Damn right. For the first 6, nothing was as clear as all want to pretend...

It's exactly a reaction of what I explained earlier.

The heavy underdog is doing so much better than expected and is given extra credit because of it. It's not intentionally done...just human nature.

 

My reaction to your card has absolutely nothing do with your amateur psychological theories and everything to do with your poor score. Marquez clearly won 2 and 5 and Pacquiao did not win a single round clearly. That means you gave every single "close" round to Pacquiao.

 

Round 2 wasn't clear at all to me and calls need to be made in close rounds, it's a matter of personal opinion. I don't believe in even rounds so besides round 5 for JMM, the other 5 were all relatively close and I had Pac take 4 of those...

 

I can't even find my thread. I think it's been removed.

Moretti scored it the same as the other 2 judges. I gave that fight to Oscar as well, but barely. Trowbridge scored in favor of Mayorga but was too close a margin. He still picked the right guy.

 

Picking the same as the other judges does not indicate a competent scorecard. Gale Van Hoy picked the same as the other judges in Diaz-Malignaggi but no one in their right mind would say that constitutes a valid defense. Likewise, the other two judge being in complicit in robbing Sturm does not let Moretti off the hook for his part in the crime.

 

I lost respect for manny for saying that he "CLEARLY WON", when deep down inside him, he knew juan beat him cleanly.. He's a liar now.