What happened to all the PAC FANS?

:yep:good

 

Schooled? DO you honestly think saying **** like "Schooled" or "Embaressed" carry any weight with serious posters Pimp?

All this talk of 'schooling', 'destroying', or 'EASILY BEATING Pac', the typical **** going around, is you guys simply over compensating.

A simple case of "Say it loud, and over and over AND OVER" Syndrome.

 

better question, what happened to your wonderful prediction of **** drinker winning

eat a dick hater and quit tryin to start ****

 

Marquez's victory is Floyd's Victory? Marquez had the balls to face Pac three times, while Floyd's vagina quivers when somebody mentions. GTFO with ur **** dude :rofl So when Margarito vs Cotto fight, should we give Floyd the credit for whoever wins too? You *****s are ****ing pathetic.

Let's see Floyd jump on this opportunity. Let's see if he has the balls to fight this vulnerable version of Pac.

 

sup dudes! Win, lose or draw, loyal to the end. I felt like Pac is past his prime and or did get exposed but that only means IF he fights Mayweather (**** Bob Arum btw) he'll be an underdog which I'm cool with. I had JMM 3 fight a draw because it was hard fight to judge and at times, had no clear winner on who won the round. I thought it could've went either way meaning if Marquez was announced the winner, I wouldn't argue and vice versa.

 

He got a boxing lesson. The guy looked lost in there Lance. He couldn't mount a successful attack and had no answer on how to stop from getting hit by JMM's right hand. The guy quite frankly looked amateurish at times with his poor footwork and lunging in. For a supposed P4P #1 and fighter of the decade a disappointing night to say the least

 

Theyre not fans only dick riders.

 

And now he looked LOST. BOXING LESSON? Jesus christs the exagerration with you guys has no boundries.atsch

Take a look at Marquez' face compared to Pac. Obviously one of these guys' face is worse for the wear of the other.

NOW, that's not to say I am judging on that alone, and I add that because I know you floyd ffanboys will think that is what I am saying.

What it suggests is, Pac DID hit him a lot. And hard.

Calling it a schooling or embaressing, is, as I said, simply overcompensating. It's what idiots always do here. :deal

 

I've always known they were not logical people and they can't find a way to justifiy this ROBBERY so they keep their mouths closed.

 

First did you see the fight? If so what was your card?
It's funny how you're attacking me but the general consensus is that JMM frustrated Pac made him look ineffective and sloppy and won the fight going away.

 

Yes, I saw the fight. Did you? :roll: I don't have a card in front of me.

Look, I'm asking (attacking? :roll many of you why you so clearly exaggerate to make a point? It was not a schooling or destroying or dominating or EASY WIN by any means.

Yeah, Pac was made to look so sloppy he still outlanded JMM and made his face MUCH worse for wear. That doesn't happen when you hit air.

 

Pacquiao did the damage from a butt and jabs. Pacquiao was given a boxing lesson ******. Close fight or not, the fans did not boo because they thought Pacquiao won by more points.

 

Two Mexicans fell in one night, PAC over JMM in boxing and DOS SANTOS over VASQUEZ in UFC, get it over it boys...accept defeat

 

No doubt! I'm surprised at how well JMM did but actually happy for Juan. Pac is still going to be Pac and dominate MOST.... But like Ali who had fits with Norton and Ray who had fits with Hearns, Hagler and Shrank... Pac has JMM which has provided boxing with an incredible trilogy. ALL their fights were close...and both in my opinion had outcomes that favored each other... It's fitting we see a 4th fight, right.

 

this.

Still believe the 3rd fight was JMM's finest moment and not Pacman's downfall like all rejoicing *****s are assuming