Pac hit and dont get hit against the crude JMM

That poll was done at a neutral time. Calzaghe is long retired and still ranks high. A poll done today would be biased considering it was after a fight.

 

That's because all the *******s voted for *****s and the Floyd fans voted for *******s and other groups also since they actually talk about different boxers. I myself voted for Klit fans, but I'm changing it to *******s
Klit fans are most biased, but *******s are the most annoying

 

you just cant get off em, eh?

so, how do you rate *****s?

 

Owned.

 

Judges could never be wrong.Lara vs williams would be a perfect example.

 

Judges way off on Lara-Williams.

However, on Pac-JMM3, they were spot on.

:deal

 

116-112 was spot on, eh?

You must be ****ing high.

 

you're talking about ESB's opinion. Check out who's opinions mattered the most.

This content is protected

 

JMM fans resorting to boxers opinion vs judges on ringside who are concentrating on the fight lol

 

You know Boxing to me is the display of heat, strength, skills and style in the ring

To the *******s and *****s its like dealing with kids

"my dad could beat up your dad" "oh yeah well my dad could beat up your dad better"

******ed comments without reason

Marquez won the fight and got robbed, yes Pac had his moments but overall Marquez controlled the pace of the fight and fought intelligently which is what none of his past opponents have done. Taking snippets from a fight dont prove jack ****.

There were no PEDs, No cramps and No excuses. Pac lost and Arum like a greedy ***** made sure he didnt lose his cash cow. I think it was reported somewhere that Arum went up to Marquez and said "hey its just business"

If Arum wants to play Godfather, he might want to remember what happened to the last jewish guy that did

This content is protected

 

Well to be fair I started out a Calzaghe fan when i first started watching boxing, started watching the SMW division and started watching other fighters in the weight classes, then watched 175, predicted Amir Khan would get sparked in the first round (not out of knowledge but more because i didnt like him back then) started watching 135,140,147 etc.

Now im a hardcore boxing fan, everyone starts somewhere

 

Nonito >>>>>> Wapakman :deal

 

PAC - W-2 DRAW -1
oh, no JUDGE made a mistake in scoring the first fight

PAC - 3 MARQUEZ - 0 :hat

 

Oh please, Marquez landed the better punches in the rounds. Pacquiao lost the fight in my scorecard and many others but ce la ve its over now.

Its just a shame that such a great fighter who wasnt given a chance and put on a performance like that got shat on :-(

 

1-Pacman did NOT school Marquez

2-The video had too many repeats

3-What the video did show was pacman fought more intelligently than his previous fights and I would say this is why JMM's face was more busted than pacman's.

4-Being biased is a *****, people need to give both guys credit for their fight, people over estimated pacman dominating JMM and underestimated JMM neutralising manny and fightin so well.

5-The fight was not a robbery, all those boxers who cried "robbery" so had "close" fights where their loses/wins have/are disputed and would cry their arses out to defend their win

6-Put *****s, pisstards, *******s, whatevertards into their own forum and let them chat **** to eachother there

7-PAC vs a floyd or PAC vs JMM 4 or stfu and retire