are you savvy enough about boxing...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by john garfield, Nov 21, 2011.


  1. I tend to look at things as having potential or not. Its obvious they are all good fighters, I would definitely look further into these fighters but judging them only on their bad days and not knowing any better, i can't see the greatness.
     
  2. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    Boxing mavens, look into your chrystal balls. Do you see Jorge Linares bounding back to greatness after his shocking 11th round TKO to Antonio DeMarco, like Louis did after the first Schmelling fight?
     
  3. Scottrf

    Scottrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,547
    0
    May 1, 2010
    I don't think you could from Ray there. Past his best and out of his best weight, he doesn't have his speed or fluency.

    Easy to say now but I think you could see it in Louis out of those, and that he simply had a stylistic error which he needed to correct.

    I don't think Linares has ever had greatness.
     
  4. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    But do you think Linares can get there, S?
     
  5. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    I've always thought Linares was a hype job, actually. You can check any of my posts on my old account. Never thought he would amount to anything, despite the plaudits he was receiving. Just not an impressive fighter for my money.
     
  6. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    Where's he fall short ,EB?
     
  7. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    He just always struck me as a very basic technician with no notable physical attributes and no real ring savvy, i.e. not a thinking man's fighter, easily deterred, etc. His deficiencies were already exposed to certain extents by the better guys he faced when he was still being hyped (although he was fighting trash, more or less).

    I would raise anyone the exact opposition question, actually, what do you guys see in him? Or what did you ever see if you're no longer a believer? It'd be kind of hard to still be a believer, mind you, given the fact that he's also been exposed as having a glass jaw to go along with the fact that he's easily thrown off.
     
  8. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    Different horses for different courses, EB
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Duran-DeJesus I: Early signs that Duran is overrated. In the second fight when DeJesus gave Duran movement he had problems.
     
  10. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Whitaker is overrated. This was proven early on when he got dropped by the B-level Roger Mayweather.
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    So your really comparing am up and coming with 11 pro fights Whitaker getting knocked down by an experanced vetren in Roger Mayweather and I will give you the B fighter part to Duran at the time an experanced vetran with 31 fights losing to a B level boxer than 10 fights latter still having problems with him?
     
  12. Jear

    Jear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,720
    12
    Jul 27, 2004
    Purely on the fights mentioned IMO you would struggle to suggest you could see greatness. Technical deficencies are abundant from all the greats in these particular bouts.

    By the same token if the only footage of Douglas and Tyson was their fight it would be tough to imagine Tyson had been such a dominant force