The Chisora result MUST be classed as a robbery

Any one who had it for Helenius is a very naughty boy (see above) Chisora won that by 10-2 imo. An even worse robbery than Alexander-Kotelnik.
Also, Duke's scoring was even worse than your typical Lederman effort. Quite an achievement. Should really be sacked after that.

 

CHisora vs Helenius was HW FOTY but also ROTY. Guess Chisora winning was not part of the Sauerland script.

 

Secret Fin?

No way was the fight close.

Chisora won the Majority of rounds and was robbed in Finland, Fact.

 

LOL KO'd by a punch that didn't even land

 

That's how hard the legend Danny Green hits.

 

This is classic 'boy who called wolf'.

Every week we here about this robbery and that robbery. In reality they are close fights that could of gone either way. Then comes along a fight, that is poorly judged...

Chisora has been hard done by, not least because of people on this forum, getting far too excited about close fights, that were not robberies...

 

Oh come on, inept judging is inept judging.

So what you're telling me is, that if people didn't moan about close fights being robberies on here then there would have either been;

A: Different judges selected in Finland leading to a different decision
B: The same judges, but they would've scored it differently, safe in the knowledge that no one has been moaning about the decisions of close fights on internet forums.

No. Just No.

 

and i had Martinez ahead against Burns. :tired

Come off it Dunky, Chisora won that clear as day mate.

 

I am telling you there is a difference between Scenario A: A close fight where you disagree with the victor; and Scenario B: A fight that the vast majority think the other fighter won.

You muddle that up, you lack credibility, when scenario B happens, rather than scenario A, but you have been screaming up about Scenario A being a 'robbery'.

 

Clear Robbery. Anyone who says otherwise don't know **** about boxing.

 

There are plenty who do know **** about boxing, who are saying it is a one/two point fight...

Judging in boxing is very much open too interpretation.

 

helenius made me a little sick in my mouth wen he was celebrating at the end how does he sleep

 

Ok Sherlock, how would you interpret a guy getting beat up from Pillar to post for 12 rounds?? Getting beat to the punch in the vast majority of rounds. So long as you got a good pair of eyes, even if you have never watched a boxing match in your life, surely there is only one way you possibly interpret that??

Yeah if it's close it comes down to what you saw. However a fight like this, sorry but you need to be blind or extremely ****ing biased to give that decision to Helenius.

 

Firstly, Alex Leapai is a no mark.

Secondly, it is impossible using the criteria for scoring a fight to give that to Helenius.

 

Judges don't score on attitude and mannerism, it's not part of their criteria. Pro judges should not be swayed by who they want to win. The only mannerism of Delboy that caught my attention was the mannerism of him boxing Helenius out of the fight all night long