If you disagree with some poll choices I made, get over it and vote for the one you feel was a true robbery.
You obviously do not want the influence the poll result with your opinions or embedding a single video of just one option in your poll.. Since you just want objective results in your objective poll...
obviously a *******. it was clearly a robbery and due to who was involved, this should have left the biggest mark in this year's robberies. But the Chisora fight was straight up ridonkulous
Chisora won every round. Helenius won no more than 3 rounds. Any criteria, Chisora wins. Hell, for Williams at least you have the deluded "He was aggressive. He was throwing punches. He had output." Chisora was the aggressive throwing and landing, though. Has to be that fight.
1) Lara vs Williams 2) Helenius vs Chisora 3) Alexander vs Matthysse 4) Sturm vs Macklin 5) Pacquiao vs Marquez Lara vs Williams is the worst of the year imo, but closely followed by the Helenius debacle. And why is there a vid about Dwyer?!? Who takes that bottom dweller serious anyway?! :blood
JMM vs Pacman and Helenius vs Chisora. I think Jmm vs Pacman was the worst because a lot of people saw the robbery (bigger event), that's not good for boxing.
Both Lara and Chisora were ****ed over. Hard. I'm not sure which was worse, probably Helenius-Chisora. More and more fans are being driven away from boxing because of this sort of corruption.
I've never understood the argument about doing enough to "take" the title from the champion. Is winning more rounds not enough anymore? If the so-called "b-side" fighter wins by one point, should they just let the champion keep his title. For the record, I had Marquez and Matthyssé winning but i wouldn't call either robberies.
They were all terrible robberies, I would say Williams-Lara was the worst, but I voted for Pac-Marquez because of the significance of it all. Pac won 4 rounds at the most, it was a blatant robbery.