Hatton is still the last real 140 linear champ

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rayrobinson, Dec 11, 2011.


  1. Fighting Pride

    Fighting Pride Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,538
    1
    Feb 12, 2009
    Khan will be back at the top, should he choose to remain at 140. Even Tszyu had his downs and came back stronger, as did Hatton though he never really lost at 140 until Pac. If Khan beats Peterson in the rematch this disputed loss will just be a blip on his record and he will be rated possibly higher given how highly regarded coming back from adversity is in boxing. He beats Bradley and he's top ten P4P.
     
  2. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    :patsch

    Not only is the fact that you want us to ignore the Pacquiao fight pure insanity, but Floyd was never the lineal champ there either you total ****ing imbecile. ****, you're stupid. :-(
     
  3. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    No man you are stupid , I said Floyd at 147.

    what is your problem with the english language?
     
  4. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol::lol: What you expecting from Hatton schill. They live in a parallel universe where their boy is king.
     
  5. GTWOSIX

    GTWOSIX Active Member Full Member

    1,072
    0
    Dec 10, 2010
    :lol: Khan wouldn't last 8 rounds vs Prime Hatton imo.
     
  6. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol: No he would. He'd box his ear's off. Prime Hatton was beating up WBU tin cans remember? O no...you don't remember...
     
  7. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    Is it about the belt or who you fight?

    When Hatton was fighting these tin cans Judah was fighting Millet and Bergman for so called IBF world title fights ffs.
     
  8. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    The belt is a CLEAR indication of a fighters level. Hatton defended a garbage belt 15 times. Likewise his competition over that tenure was nothing short of a joke. Are you seriously trying to defend that? As that mon fere was prime Hatton.

    And both Bergman and Millet were KNOWN name fighters at the time who had mixed on the fringes of world class. None of Hattons opponents back then were anything remotely close to world class. Poor example. You should really try watching those fights and understanding their significance at the time instead of trawling Boxrec.
     
  9. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!


    Hatton is the last lineal junior welter?
     
  10. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    Trawling Boxrec??

    Man , the reason I picked out Bergman and Millet is that they both dropped Judah , infact Millet had him bad. I wouldnt imagine Boxrec says this . I talk about fights I watch .

    Bergman is from South Africa I think and totally average yet gets a chance at the IBF title???? come on please. I also think the title was vacant and Hatton was higher ranked.

    I even remember watching Witter school his ass.

    At the same time Hatton was fighting Tony Pep who I think had fought Mayweather in his previous fight.

    The above is all memory so if its wrong I appologise .

    I will only go to Boxrec for dates of fights , not results.
     
  11. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    None of this matters b. The point is Hatton wasted years defending a garbage belt against garbage competition. And for that he is rightly vilified.
     
  12. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    So now it doesnt matter , because I am able to back up my point?

    peace on a sunday man , but your wrong.