My god its hard to figure this out. Some many variables to take into account. Bradley is undefeated has a victory over Peterson but as other's have mentioned can you just ignore the fact he outright ducked Khan or should that even come into the equation? I mean if Bradley signed with Top Rank it's highly unlikely he will fight Khan or could have because of his promotional ties with GBP. again should that come into account when considering rankings? Peterson has the win over Khan but its not definitive by any means. Most people who have Lamont winning normally only have him by a point. This includes two dubious point deductions in the new champs backyard. also who has Bradley beaten recently? 40 year old Casamayor at ww? that doesn't do a lot for me, So after ridiculous deliberation. 1.Peterson 2.Khan 3.Bradley
This. Too many people hate. Damn near everyone labels any successful fighter a hypejob nowadays, and fighters that win close decision rarely get talked about as if they won, it just doesnt make sense too much around here.
It's utterly ridiculous to suggest that the only reason Bradley signed with Top Rank was to get away from Khan. He also fought Alexander within the past calendar year, and he was ranked more highly within the division than any of the opponents Khan has taken on this year.
The tournament kinda happnd b4 hand. Timid Timmy ducked Khan and went into hiding under his big pillow in the process pregnating his wife and picking up 2 legal cases. Now tht Lamont got handed a SD in his hometown with a fellow brother ref he is the next big thing. His time has come to shine. As for Khan lets see what the investigations say... 9 days remaining for a verdict. Then he needs to work his ass of in the gym. Regardless of what a big ragu says there were clear flaws tht were visible in Khan's game. I would like a showdown btw Timmy vs Lamont ; will be truly a bullfight.