That's ok, because the two judges validate my scoring. If I'm only 1 point off of two official judges, I'll take that. I think Round 12 sealed it for Ward. And I have no problem with him getting the nod. There is no "robbery" here or anything like that. Just giving my take. And props to Ward on the win! :good
RD1 10-9 RD2 10-9 RD3 10-9 RD4 10-9 RD5 9-10 RD6 10-9 RD7 10-9 RD8 10-9 RD9 9-10 RD10 10-9 RD11 9-10 RD12 9-10 116 - 112 Ward. Hugely impressive performance.
Which would also mean two of the three official judges don't know anything about boxing. They had it 7-5 rounds, I had it 6-6 rounds. We only disagreed on one round, overall. I'll take that. :good
CF-AW 1. 9-10 2. 10-10 3. 9-10 4. 9-10 5. 10-9 6. 9-10 7. 9-10 8. 9-10 9. 9-10 10. 9-10 11. 10-10 12. 10-9 118-112 Ward
No it doesn't. And it wouldn't surprise me at all if those two judges started giving Froch rounds at the end so that they didn't get accused of any sort of bias. There's no way that fight was a draw. You may want to take a closer look at how you score fights.
I stopped scoring after the 6th. The 12th was genuinely emotional. The referee was fantastic. Ward was so classy, in the fight & after. He made me a fan tonight. Great night.
Yes, actually it does. Regardless of whether or not you want it to, or whether or not you say it does. I was within one point of two official judges. My scoring has been validated, and that makes me feel good about how I scored the fight. Lets me know I was on the right track. :thumbsup