Pac Won The Fight Against Marquez

Fixed.

 

Puga.....fighters, trainers, fightfans, etc.....the majority have the opinion that Pacquiao's connects were ineffective. Thats why you dont judge a fight on compubox numbers.

.....and to add to that, we all know HBO is fully capable of rigging those numbers. They hire the people who count, they surely can rig the numbers to suit their house fighter.
........I can go on and on.

Even in a case where the numbers were not rigged, compubox is not an effective barometer in judging the potency and effectiveness of punches.

You *******s are grasping at straws when you want to bring compubox numbers into the equation.

The compubox numbers favored Marquez the two previous fights, but I dont bring them up because I know its an ineffective tool to use in judging the effectiveness of the shots being connected.

Eventually we will all stop talking about this fight and you will be left sitting knowing the truth. That Marquez landed the the cleaner, heavier, and more accurate head snapping blows. While most of Pacquiao's connects were arm punches with little to no leverage an torque behind them.

Pacquiao took alot of the sting off his shots and did'nt use his legs to drive his punches through. You know why he did it Puga, Pacquiao was getting countered with bone jarring shots everytime his more powerful attempts missed the target........but you want to hide your hero behind compubox numbers rigged to suit an HBO agenda.


You know it but dont want to publicly admit it. You want to coverup the realitiy by using the corrupt tools HBO uses to fulfill their corrupt ridden agenda. Every hardcore boxing fan to a man knows HBO is just as corrupt if not more so than boxing itself.

Live with the reality and live free!:yep:bbb:bbb:bbb

 

Lance is owning these idiots :rofl

It's time to move on though. Time for me to go to gym and learn Floyd's phily shell (it looks cool) I hope I dont get knocked out in sparring with that ****.

 

Clean hard connects is what a judge is supposed to put the most emphasis on in his scoring.

The first two criteria are clean punching and effective aggression, and the rules for scoring say emphasis has to be taken for clean effective connects.


You've just made a case to why Marquez won.
You say he should have pushed the fight in the later rounds.

Listen to yourself Lance. You're asking the premier counterboxer in the business to take it to Pacquiao and lay it on him.atsch

Marquez was boxing a clinic and in the late rounds when team Pacquiao know their well behind they ask Pacquiao to lay it on the line and put Marquez on his ass.
Instead, Pacquiao was content to waltz center ring with Marquez and make those last couple of rounds uneventful.

Marquez stood to his guns and gameplan and remained the counterpuncher looking for Pacquiao to come to him.
Pacquiao fought Marquez' fight. We would all expect Pacquiao in a fight he's losing to lay it on the line and take risks.
He did none of the sort and was content to finish on his feet without having to eat the same type of leather he ate everytime he got aggressive.


Its called ring generalship Uppercut.
Pacquiao was totally thrown off his game and clearly and visibly looked a frustrated fighter. While Marquez was totally zoned in and on his game fighting with a confidence unmatched by any other Pacquiao opponent since the first Morales fight.

We all know it, even the *******s. Why not admit it Uppercut?

 

1. There is TV footage of the fight. There is TV-footage of the stats presented. We all know? You are not we. If you believe that, get the evidence, or don't go that way.

2. Yes, that is what you are doing. Going on and on and on. Try watching the fight with your 14 Marquez-glasses off.

3. Again. An accusation without nothing to support it.

4. Of course. They have an agenda to rip of an Mexican fighter vs. a Filipino one, that sounds so logical doesn't it?atsch


Fight was close. Either fighter could have won. End of story.

Go over to a "we didn't land on the moon"-forum and make a case there, it's about the same.

 

Well, I wouldn't say owning. But thanks. :good

 

You are about as unbiased as those you call ******* Divac. You've seen what you want to see for ages now. With you, we'll just disagree and move on.

 

The reason the rounds aren't the same is because most of the posters are *******S that don't know how to score. this really isn't a hard concept to understand.

 

atsch The thread was for those who SCORED the win for JMM dip****, AKA floyd fanatics and Pac haters (not all BTW). Go get an empty can, sit outside on a curb, and ask for spare change so you can buy some friggin humility... :rofl

 

The judges were more consistent, even with their inconsistencies. I still attribute why many call this a robbery to unmet expectations on Pacquiao's part and Marquez doing more than expected of him. Add also that Pacquiao has a lot of haters with biases and agendas.

 

Can't argue there.

 

Wrong again. How the **** do you know that it's just for the people that scored for JMM? It's for all the boxing fans you dumb****.

 

That was the point of that particular thread Mr. Smart man. Now, just slink away please...before you embarrass yourself with more ignorant comments on a thread you don't even know about. atsch

 

Tommy is as thick as two planks!

 

I may steal this line. :yep